Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+Permitting\s+Spec\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+Permitting\s+Spec\'s\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tower Permitting Spec's (score: 1): Author: Wilson Lamb <infomet@embarqmail.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 14:24:17 -0400 (EDT); It's painful to read this stuff. The spec's are regularly revised and interpreted. They are based on model(s), history, tradition, and probably rules of thumb, backed up by calculations to three deci; /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-04/msg00310.html (9,989 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Permitting Spec's (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 11:56:54 -0700; On 4/30/18 11:24 AM, Wilson Lamb wrote: It's painful to read this stuff. The spec's are regularly revised and interpreted. They are based on model(s), history, tradition, and probably rules of thumb,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-04/msg00312.html (13,898 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Permitting Spec's (score: 1): Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 16:43:15 -0400; Hans, An 85 ft tower with only a guy at the top doesn't sound safe to me. If its intended to be guy'd, unless its something like Rohn 65, that can't be a good design. And even if it were Rohn 65, I w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-05/msg00011.html (7,109 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]