- 1. [TowerTalk] Tower Re-Cabling (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:01:27 -0400
- While this subject has no doubt been covered at some juncture in the past, I will ask it again since I have personal and immediate interest in the answers as well as a friend who is about to put up a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-06/msg00174.html (8,509 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Re-Cabling (score: 1)
- Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 15:51:21 -0700
- 316 stainless is a good choice for corrosive environments. Some sailboat makers use it for rigging and good boatyards may stock it and certainly will have swaging equipment and fittings if you can ge
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-06/msg00179.html (9,703 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Re-Cabling (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 19:51:21 -0400
- The problem with the 300 series stainless steels is that they cannot be heat treated. Using the McMaster-Carr website, compare 316 7x19 with galvanized steel. For a given diameter, it's about half th
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-06/msg00180.html (10,941 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Re-Cabling (score: 1)
- Author: EZ Rhino <ezrhino@fastmovers.biz>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 20:06:17 -0600
- Here's how Bill does it: http://www.kc4pe.com/lub.JPG If you scroll to the bottom of the page here http://www.kc4pe.com/amateurshack.htm (it takes a while to load) you can see some more details. Hope
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-06/msg00182.html (9,634 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Re-Cabling (score: 1)
- Author: K7LXC@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 17:23:40 -0400 (EDT)
- galvanized and as I recall these were recommended over stainless steel. The tower uses TWO 1/4 cables for the bottom and middle section with ONE 3/16" cable for the top section. Are there degrees of
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-06/msg00190.html (8,338 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu