Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+and\s+antenna\s+decisions\s*$/: 64 ]

Total 64 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 02:26:26 -0700
BULLSHIT! N6BV;s HFTA terrain analysis software uses USGS terrain data to model the behavior of horizontally polarized antennas. It is DAMN GOOD! If you live in flatland, NEC is sufficient. If you ha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00406.html (10,563 bytes)

42. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 02:45:51 -0700
Jim, You're the audio expert, but didn't Bob Carver figure out some clever variable supply voltage tricks with his big Sunfire amps? I have two and my "Signature" stereo is rated 2 to 16 ohms (1250w/
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00407.html (10,248 bytes)

43. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: Scott <scottw3tx@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 08:49:40 -0400
There are young people that read this list to learn about abtennas and communications. And adults that expect this board to be profanity free. Please keep the language clean and professional. Best re
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00408.html (8,149 bytes)

44. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 19:09:33 -0700
Icom PW1 73 Jim W7RY The fact that most (not all) SS Amps have Automatic Antenna Tuners just reinforces my statement. What QRO SS amps (1KW and above) have built in tuners? I've not found one yet. 73
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00409.html (11,807 bytes)

45. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 07:14:19 -0700
On 10/26/13 11:17 PM, Jim Brown wrote: On 10/26/2013 10:57 PM, Grant Saviers wrote: You're the audio expert, but didn't Bob Carver figure out some clever variable supply voltage tricks with his big S
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00413.html (12,682 bytes)

46. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 11:46:45 -0700
That's not necessarily the case.. if the amplifier has variable bias and drain voltages that adjust to what's needed for the match, you can optimize the efficiency at all powers. A simple design with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00416.html (11,812 bytes)

47. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 12:57:35 -0700
That's not necessarily the case.. if the amplifier has variable bias and drain voltages that adjust to what's needed for the match, you can optimize the efficiency at all powers. A simple design wit
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00417.html (12,708 bytes)

48. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:39:47 -0700
is STILL better. The 1st 45 feet doesnt count. You need that just to clear junk + clutter in the surrounding neighbourhood. I won't dispute that. 35 ft up on 20m. Gee -- from your earlier post, to wh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00426.html (13,251 bytes)

49. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 12:08:04 -0700
Jerry Letvin would agree with you, he used the same term in a televised broadcast in the early 60's. The FCC did not react. 73, Dick, W1KSZ _______________________________________________ ___________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00427.html (14,161 bytes)

50. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 12:16:42 -0700
Take one of these 89 ft crank ups....and run it from 26 ft nested..up to 89 ft extended..and its a real eye opener. I have a slight uphill rise from N-S...all facing east. And slightly downhill....
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00428.html (10,745 bytes)

51. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 21:58:24 -0700
Just having returned from our mini-dxpedition to Raivavae (Australs, French Polynesia) as TX5D I can confirm how loud or "only station on the band" big high antennas sound. e.g W6CCP was working Asia
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00435.html (12,053 bytes)

52. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:56:52 -0600
Yes I have seem frequent times when my 50 ft high 10m yagi outperforms my 110 ft yagi. Usually the higher yagi is the best, but there are times when the signal is barley audible on the higher yagi, t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00439.html (9,154 bytes)

53. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:28:29 -0400 (EDT)
During the WPX SSB in the early 2000s.... 5/5/5/5 at 200 ft out of phase KT34XA at 65 ft A-3 at 40 ft Around 2000Z on 20 meters....the A-3 kicked the crap out of the other two to the NE. Higher is us
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00440.html (9,777 bytes)

54. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:43:52 -0400
Yes I have seem frequent times when my 50 ft high 10m yagi outperforms my 110 ft yagi. 50 vs. 110 feet on 10 meters is really a special case. At 50' you're already 1.5 waves above ground - a level th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00441.html (10,903 bytes)

55. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 09:53:05 -0500
Richard, It isn't an issue of what you can get away with and not be prosecuted. The protest was based on civility and pedagogical considerations. The original protest was based on the protester's per
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00442.html (17,602 bytes)

56. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 08:25:57 -0700
Anyone care to advise me regarding issues relating to the coax run up the tower in the case of a crank-up tilt over with a rotating antenna atop it? 1. How do you keep the coax tangle and jam free wh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00443.html (12,003 bytes)

57. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:25:46 -0400 (EDT)
the tower in the case of a crank-up tilt over with a rotating antenna atop it? rotates? Howdy -- There are 2 ways to do it: 1) tape all the cables coming down the mast together and leave 4-5 feet or
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00444.html (10,173 bytes)

58. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:06:39 -0700
Have you looked at the Glenmartin Hazer? It's a carriage that runs up and down the outside of Rohn 25 like an elevator. You mount your rotator, mast, bearing and yagi on the carriage. Now you can win
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00453.html (11,309 bytes)

59. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:55:20 -0700
Just curious, never used a Hazer, but, how do you deal with the guy wires ?? 73, Dick, W1KSZ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00460.html (12,929 bytes)

60. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: Drax Felton <draxfelton@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:05:35 -0400
Install the top set of guys first before raising tower. Crank hazer up part way. Climb up and Install the lower set below the hazer. The unhook the upper set at the earth anchor and crank the hazer u
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00461.html (14,360 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu