- 41. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns (score: 1)
- Author: ae4mr@arrl.org (Dave Armbrust)
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:50:17 -0500
- It has been suggested that I ignore the bracket as it could fail and design it as self supporting. So I ran the numbers. Here is the conclusion I can make regarding Self Supporting Rohn 45g tower in
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00447.html (9,787 bytes)
- 42. [TowerTalk] Tower concerns (score: 1)
- Author: ae4mr@arrl.org (Dave Armbrust)
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:09:53 -0500
- It appears I can do the math myself in about 30 minutes. It is really not that tough. For what it is worth I think paying $350 to engineer to tell me my limit is 10' for a self supporting Rohn 45g t
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00448.html (11,295 bytes)
- 43. [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns (score: 1)
- Author: wesandlinda@triconet.org (wesandlinda@triconet.org)
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 01:52:06 +0000
- How did I do that? Oh well, I'm going to lobby my county government to outlaw QRM and QRN too:) N7WS -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Admin
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00456.html (10,531 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu