Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+for\s+Challenging\s+Terrain\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tower for Challenging Terrain (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Gardner <jerryw6uv@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 14:35:03 -0800
I recently moved to a new QTH and want to put up a 70' tower for a 20m monoband yagi and a 15/10 duoband yagi. I have 10 acres, but the terrain is challenging. Almost all of it is on a fairly steep s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-03/msg00100.html (7,568 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower for Challenging Terrain (score: 1)
Author: "J.P." <jp@ezoom.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:05:42 -0800
Having done this myself, the answer is sure you can put up a guyed tower on a slope. What's important to maintain are the angles of the guys to the tower and the tension on them. If you maintain the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-03/msg00101.html (8,892 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower for Challenging Terrain (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 08:57:15 -0800
Good advice. I did exactly that with my tower, where the terrain slopes both a little and a lot, depending on directlon. I'm in a rather dense redwood forest. The guys going in one direction hit the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-03/msg00114.html (9,448 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower for Challenging Terrain (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Gardner <jerryw6uv@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:51:31 -0800
Thanks Jim and JP. That's very useful information. I don't have massive redwood trees. All of the trees on my property are live oaks and the largest is probably only 25' tall and not very massive, so
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-03/msg00115.html (10,334 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower for Challenging Terrain (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 16:41:37 -0500
Ditto. My 110' Rohn 55 tower is on a steep slope. The base is on a narrow strip of relatively flat ground that's not much wider than the base in the uphill/downhill direction, but stretches away from
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-03/msg00116.html (11,326 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower for Challenging Terrain (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 17:32:55 -0800
The total run from shack to antenna feedpoint is 350 ft. I'm using a combination of half-inch and 3/4-inch Andrew heliax that I bought from the estate of a local ham. 73, Jim K9YC ___________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-03/msg00119.html (8,483 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower for Challenging Terrain (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Gardner <jerryw6uv@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 19:02:21 -0800
My run will be approx. 400-450 feet, so I'll have to find a similar source of hardline. 73, Jerry _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-03/msg00121.html (8,387 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower for Challenging Terrain (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 20:56:38 -0800
It has been suggested many times on this list that we contact CATV companies to ask for their junk lengths of CATV hard line. Yes, it's 75 ohms, but the loss is quite small, and the additional loss d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-03/msg00124.html (8,788 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower for Challenging Terrain (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 06:08:27 -0500
My local cable company (Comcast) used to give away the occasional short ends (less than 100 feet), but closed their scrap yard a couple of years ago, citing the tight economy and the rising price of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-03/msg00125.html (10,108 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu