Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+insurance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+insurance\s*$/: 45 ]

Total 45 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower insurance (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 07:11:53 -0400; One thing I discovered is that at least in this state most umbrella liability policies are quite expensive, because they anticipate exposure to car accident liability. If you specify that the umbrell; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00820.html (10,132 bytes)
22. [TowerTalk] Tower Insurance (score: 1): Author: Dan Bookwalter <n8dcj@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:47:36 -0700 (PDT); I will putting the TX-472 up in the next month , I am renting so I do not have actual homeowners insurance. Does anyone have any recommendations on insurance companies to investigate ? Thanks Dan N8D; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00356.html (6,668 bytes)
23. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Insurance (score: 1): Author: Mike <nf4l@nf4l.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:02:03 -0400; 73, Mike NF4L _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00357.html (7,657 bytes)
24. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Insurance (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:01:55 EDT; not have actual homeowners insurance. investigate ? Your tower is either considered personal property or an appurtenant (auxiliary?) structure so generally either way you're covered. Ray Fallen, ND8L; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00367.html (8,082 bytes)
25. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Insurance (score: 1): Author: Alan NV8A <nv8a@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:14:39 -0400; My insurance agent told me that the tower is considered an "accessory structure" -- same as "appurtenant (auxiliary?) structure???? -- IF it is "attached to" the building. The "attachment" may be nom; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00370.html (8,468 bytes)
26. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Insurance (score: 1): Author: "Mark Robinson" <markrob@mindspring.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:30:30 -0400; So if it is an "accessory structure" how does effect your coverage. Is it automatically covered on your home insurance then? 73 Mark N1UK _______________________________________________ ____________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00372.html (8,826 bytes)
27. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Insurance (score: 1): Author: Greg - AB7R <ab7r@cablespeed.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:34:39 -0400; I just reviewed my home policy with State Farm and they stated that a tower that is installed on the property is covered....as well as the radios for theft, lightning...etc. -- 73, Greg - AB7R Whidbe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00373.html (9,751 bytes)
28. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Insurance (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:32:19 -0400; In my area, my agent (State Farm) defines anything on the property as long as it is associated with the lives of the people living there as an accessory structure. After all, would you exclude a gara; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00374.html (10,140 bytes)
29. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Insurance (score: 1): Author: Mike <nf4l@nf4l.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:44:32 -0400; That's a question for you agent. 73, Mike NF4L _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00375.html (8,738 bytes)
30. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Insurance (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:10:47 -0400; Contact an agent ... there has been a lot of speculation here but since you are a renter special issues are at play. Renters insurance generally covers contents - not structures on a property even if; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00380.html (10,084 bytes)
31. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Insurance (score: 1): Author: Alan NV8A <nv8a@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:55:53 -0400; It just means that it has the same coverage as any other "accessory structure" according to the terms of the contract. Ray Fallen's article starts on p. 51 of the February 2009 QST. He is a State Far; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00381.html (9,541 bytes)
32. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Insurance (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:42:06 EDT; structure" -- same as "appurtenant (auxiliary?) structure???? -- IF it is "attached to" the building. The "attachment" may be nominal but cannot be merely the electrical connections. A customer of mi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00382.html (8,704 bytes)
33. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Insurance (score: 1): Author: "Dick Dievendorff" <dieven@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:05:45 -0700; It was a perversely humorous situation watching three code inspectors looking my "attachment" over and each nodding sagely. One asked if it had any structural significance. I said "no, the tower is s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00385.html (10,682 bytes)
34. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Insurance (score: 1): Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:11:42 -0500; What are you going to do with the large concrete/rebar base when your lease expires? Did you get a building permit? Are you in conformity with the local zoning regs? Are you putting down a lightning; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00386.html (9,426 bytes)
35. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Insurance (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:49:37 -0400; Different companies treat towers differently. Some treat them as "appurtenant" structures with a value up to 10% of the primary structure. It's easy even with a modern dwelling to exceed 10% of the c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00389.html (11,155 bytes)
36. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Insurance (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:59:38 -0700; Did you get it in writing? My agent told me unless it was specifically stated that it was covered, it wasn't. Mine is actually bracketed to my house, so guess that makes a difference. It is covered.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00390.html (8,792 bytes)
37. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Insurance (score: 1): Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:36:23 -0400; I don't believe renters insurance would cover a tower. Usually renters insurance is for your own personal (inside) pocessions. I suppose they could add a clause about a tower if you get it put up, bu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00397.html (9,104 bytes)
38. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Insurance (score: 1): Author: Dan Bookwalter <n8dcj@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 06:35:24 -0700 (PDT); "What are you going to do with the large concrete/rebar base when your lease expires?" Actually I don't have to sign a lease. It stays , the landlord doesn't really care , however , the base will be; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00407.html (11,143 bytes)
39. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower insurance (score: 1): Author: "Dale M. Schwartz" <dale@immlawfirm.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 21:08:20 +0000; My State Farm agent in Georgia assured me in writing that my tower was covered as an accessory structure at no extra charge (and also that I was covered for lightening protection as well). Dale -- K4; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00440.html (6,699 bytes)
40. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower insurance (score: 1): Author: Mickey Baker <n4mb@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 17:38:49 -0500; In Florida, it will be excluded almost certainly. I have the ARRL insurance and I'm assured I'm covered. Mickey N4MB _______________________________________________ __________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00442.html (8,152 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]