Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+lighting\s*$/: 57 ]

Total 57 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tower Lighting (score: 1)
Author: hires@rust.net (Floyd Soo)
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 13:41:30 -0500
Gang, Can anyone confirm that this is indeed the case? I have heard conflicting stories, some say that tenants on the tower are no longer responsible for liability like they used to be; others are sa
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00382.html (9,243 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Tower Lighting (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom)
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 15:46:51 -0500
Floyd, So far as I know, despite rumors, the co-users have ALWAYS been jointly responsible for lighting and maintenance. Section 17.4 is VERY plain about this, and to the best of my knowledge that ha
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00383.html (8,923 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Tower Lighting (score: 1)
Author: p.c.white@ieee.org (Philip C. White)
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 17:00:42 -0600
I just copied the following from the Code of Federal Regulations: Sec. 78.63 Antenna structure marking and lighting. The owner of each antenna structure is responsible for ensuring that the structure
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00385.html (7,985 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Tower Lighting (score: 1)
Author: dlhough@vegas.infi.net (dlhough@vegas.infi.net)
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 02:53:25 -0800
When it comes to liability, anything goes. Years ago the old MGM Grand in Las Vegas had a big fire. It was Otis Elevator that got stuck with a huge bill. Not that Otis Elevator was at fault for the f
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00391.html (9,150 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Tower Lighting (score: 1)
Author: K7NV@contesting.com (Kurt Andress)
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 04:12:59 -0800
<36A858A4.65CC827E@vegas.infi.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-towertalk@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.contestin
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00393.html (10,744 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Tower Lighting (score: 1)
Author: kn6di@groupone.net (Dan Arney)
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 05:01:16 -0800
That is due to the blood sucking at the bar attorneys. Hank -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00394.html (7,344 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Tower Lighting (score: 1)
Author: designserv@ipass.net (LYN)
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 09:35:58 -0500
Yay, Kurt! Just remember, though, that not all lawyers are contributing to this problem -- It's just that 99% of them give the rest a bad image. Lyn -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalk
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00395.html (7,790 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Tower lighting (score: 1)
Author: wl7e@oly.silverlink.net (Joe)
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 22:35:12 -0700 (PDT)
I am in the process of getting the required permits to install a 120' tower. I have never had to go thru this process before in Alaska nor Hawaii. I am located one mile off the end of a small (less t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00364.html (9,450 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Tower lighting (score: 1)
Author: EEDWARDS@oppd.com (eedwards@oppd.com)
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 09:02:31 -0500
Joe wrote in part: Joe, Here's a few vendors to try for tower lighting: Hughey & Phillips Tower & Obstruction Lighting Company Mark Gilliam, Sales Engineer Illinois (847)307-3545 2162 Union Place Sim
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00373.html (9,326 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Tower lighting (score: 1)
Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller)
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 11:37:04 -0500
Why would there ever be a need to light a ham radio tower? Lights on a tower are very expensive. If I remember right from my broadcast engineering days; a typical flashing beacon light is very large
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00378.html (9,311 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] Tower lighting (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 14:08:13 -0400 (EDT)
I think what you need are OB (obstruction) lights. Normally you don't need a blinking beacon until you get to 200 feet. You can call CESCO (800-642-7698); talk to Jay Kent and tell him I sent you. Th
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00380.html (9,644 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] Tower lighting (score: 1)
Author: kn6di@IDT.NET (Daniel H. Arney Jr.)
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 15:12:11 -0700
The FAA Advisory Circular that covers this spec's the lights and IF YOU LIGHT THE TOWER WETHER REQUIRED OR NOT, if I remember correctly the lights must meet spec's Lots of BUX. Hank KN6DI -- FAQ on W
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00388.html (10,471 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] Tower lighting (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 18:47:33 -0400 (EDT)
Actually the rules are pretty specific on lighting and painting and it has to do with distance from an airport. It doesn't have anything to do with who the owner is and this is for obvious safety rea
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00390.html (11,530 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] Tower lighting (score: 1)
Author: k0sd@juno.com (k0sd@juno.com)
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 12:19:27 EDT
LEE, Your advise is VERY dangerous. If your tower is within the Airport rules, you better do it right. If the FCC/FAA found you using non-approved devices, the fines would be in the multiple $10,000
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00404.html (12,371 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] Tower lighting (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR)
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 97 16:19:09 -0400
You've obviously never been in an airplane LOOKING for those lights on the towers. They can be darned hard to see even if you KNOW they are there. Bottom line, if your tower installation requires lig
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00408.html (9,978 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] Tower lighting (score: 1)
Author: w5rz@cswnet.com (Dennis Schaefer)
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 16:31:03 -0500
This brings up an interesting question. Someone suggested the small lights in QST awhile back and the QST columnist stated the same thing, that even if you aren't required to use lights, any lights
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00415.html (10,513 bytes)

17. [TowerTalk] Tower lighting (score: 1)
Author: blanken@netins.net (Heinz Blankenhagen)
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 1997 02:40:10 -0500
I haven't read all the posts on this subject but I have seen a lot of opinions that are not based on fact. I have just read FCC rules 97.15 and it will answer you questions as to what towers are subj
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00419.html (8,840 bytes)

18. [TowerTalk] Tower lighting (score: 1)
Author: jleikhim@nettally.com (Leikhim, Joe)
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 1997 00:07:28 -0400
So if I light up my tiny 89 foot tower with an auto tail light just to be on the safe side because of low flying helicopters and military jocks, and years go by without anyone hitting the tower and t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00421.html (9,891 bytes)

19. [TowerTalk] Tower lighting (score: 1)
Author: kn6di@IDT.NET (Daniel H. Arney Jr.)
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 22:01:52 -0700
IF THE LIGHTS ARE ON A RADIO TOWER THEY MUST CONFORM TO THE FAA SPEC'S PERIOD. HAS NOTHING IN THE WORLD TO DO WITH ALL OF THE OTHER LIGHTS EXCEPT IF THEY ARE IN AN APPROACH AREA TO AN AIRPORT. PERIOD
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00422.html (11,800 bytes)

20. [TowerTalk] Tower lighting (score: 1)
Author: lightfol@cadvision.com (lightfoots)
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 1997 05:25:54 -0700
I think the bottom line with tower lighting is; If you are within the limits of an aerodrome that the FAA specifies, which will vary with location- they will specify exactly what you need to do- not
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00424.html (9,085 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu