Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+loading\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+loading\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] tower loading (score: 1): Author: ve6wz@shaw.ca (VE6WZ_steve); Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 17:50:44 -0600; I have estimated the total windloading (14 sq ') of my antenna stack to be less than the max. recommended by US tower...this is a good thing. However, my total antenna weight will exceed the recommen; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00068.html (7,320 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] tower loading (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 22:53:10 EDT; AT WHAT WINDSPEED? 50 MPH? In the US, the lowest rating is 70 MPH so according to the US Tower catalog NONE of them are rated correctly for ANY real application. What's your local windspeed rating? C; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00071.html (7,123 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] tower loading (score: 1): Author: KellyJohnson@telocity.com (Kelly Johnson); Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 21:50:16 -0700; US Tower catalogs state the 50 MPH ratings. If you buy the engineering specs they give you windloading specs for 50 AND 70 mph.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00072.html (7,810 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] tower loading (score: 1): Author: ssouva@twcny.rr.com (Scott & Sherry Souva); Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 06:35:22 -0400; Buy the specs? I asked and US Tower sent them to me. BTW - I love my TX-455 with a Tennadyne T-6 sitting on top. 73 de KG2S, Scott specs ve6wz@shaw.ca to be ANY; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00074.html (8,743 bytes)
5. [Towertalk] tower loading (score: 1): Author: w9jcc@juno.com (Frank C Travanty); Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 10:11:42 -0700; In my UST documentation, the only numbers that have a PE's signature next to them are the numbers given in the Engineering Specifications. For the HDX-555 it's: 23.2 sq ft (350 lb wind load) at 1 ft; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00079.html (9,573 bytes)
6. [Towertalk] tower loading (score: 1): Author: fnorton@chartermi.net (Frank W8H0); Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 18:06:18 -0400; Hi all, The energy specs are extensive and quite clear about loading all the models of Crank Up US Towers. The HDX-572MDPL is rated at 18 sq ft at 70 mph with a round element antenna. It further spec; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00130.html (7,635 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Tower loading (score: 1): Author: boerkamp@nortelnetworks.com (Ted Boerkamp); Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 08:05:11 -0500; Hello everyone.....I have a 48ft heavy duty delhi tower (rated for 9 sq ft) with a 20ft mast (10ft sticking up out of the tower) , tailtwister, 2 bearings and a TH7 tribander at about 55ft... i am ju; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00338.html (7,265 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Tower loading (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 14:01:46 EST; and to The Delhi tower is what is the Rohn BX series down here in the States. On the plus side, Delhi does provide the big straight sections (BX8, BX7, etc.) that Rohn does not so you can wind up wit; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00346.html (8,510 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Tower Loading (score: 1): Author: gbay@odi.com (gbay); Date: Thu, 26 Nov 1998 08:53:45 -0500; I have a 72 foot motorized tower, TX-472MDP, with a TH-11DX on top of it. I am attempting to load it with a gamma match for 160 per the books. Unfortunately, when I dip it, the frequency is about 6.5; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00696.html (7,312 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] Tower Loading (score: 1): Author: W4EF@pacbell.net (Michael Tope); Date: Thu, 26 Nov 1998 18:40:08 -0000; Gerry, Even without the TH-11DX on top, a 72 foot tower should look like at leat a 1/4 lambda on 80 meters. With the antenna installed, my guess is that the structure will be resonant somewhere aroun; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00700.html (8,787 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] Tower loading (score: 1): Author: Zoran Brlecic <WA7AA@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 22:03:45 -0700; mahlonhaunschild@cox.net wrote: Please explain how you arrived at your 14.4 sq ft figure for this tower configuration. Based on the information at: http://www.rohnnet.net/rohnnet2001/catalog/pdfs/25G; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00383.html (8,597 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] Tower loading (score: 1): Author: Jeff Draughn <n0ost99@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 20:05:52 -0500; I have a US Towers HDX-555 and am not sure how to figure the load on the tower from antennas placed at different heights above the tower. I know as I go up it further reduces the max. For the tower b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00359.html (7,165 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]