Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TowerTalk\]\s+Verticals\s+and\s+Vertical\s+Dipoles\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TowerTalk\]\s+Verticals\s+and\s+Vertical\s+Dipoles\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] TowerTalk] Verticals and Vertical Dipoles (score: 1): Author: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 02:22:33 +0000 (GMT); I have not tried a vertical dipole on 40m, but can report somewhat similar results with a 40m quarter wave vertical versus a horizontal dipole at about 40'. The vertical was in the clear and had abou; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00075.html (8,441 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk] Verticals and Vertical Dipoles (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 05:49:08 -0500; Me too. The only place I get a 40M vertical to nearly equal a dipole at 60-80ft is when the vertical is a hundred feet in the air. 80M is better, but the vertical only really shines on 160. My 80M d; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00081.html (9,413 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk] Verticals and Vertical Dipoles (score: 1): Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 06:43:51 -0800; If the ice that poor of a conductor, it won't be that lossy ,and it's still over the remaining liquid water, which IS a good reflector. It's more like you raised your antenna 5 feet. Think of disguis; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00090.html (9,177 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]