Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Towerheight\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Towerheight\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Towerheight (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 03:48:17 -0000; I obviously missed the central point of this post, and responded to mast vs. tower cost/weight discussion. There MAY be a subtlety in the ordinance language, regarding 'antenna support' or 'tower' as; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00598.html (7,689 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Towerheight (score: 1): Author: "Tower (K8RI)" <tower@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:23:25 -0400; Here, as in Midland Michigan (Homer Township) The tower is the supporting structure and the mast is not figured as part of that. Zoning requires any tower over 80 feet be properly engineered. They a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00600.html (9,840 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]