Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Towers\,\s+and\s+bedrock\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Towers\,\s+and\s+bedrock\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Towers, and bedrock (score: 1): Author: Charles Gallo <Charlie@TheGallos.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 14:02:31 -0500; Hi, First - Merry Christmas and Happy New Year There is a chance (small, but it's there) - that I will be getting a 2nd QTH in the near future The think is, in that general area of the country, unles; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00316.html (7,715 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Towers, and bedrock (score: 1): Author: Gene Smar <ersmar@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 13:10:44 -0600 (CST); Charles: Merry Christmas back at ya. For installations in bedrock, you can use rock anchors such as shown on this page from the Trylon tower web site: http://www.trylon.com/lightdutytowers/selfsuppor; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00317.html (8,225 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Towers, and bedrock (score: 1): Author: WD0M <WD0M@centurytel.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 20:41:01 -0700; Been there, done that. We have bedrock about 6 inches under the soil. Nonetheless, I put up a US Tower TX-455 about 4 years ago, and it's withstood 90 mph gusts. Works very well. Check my web page fo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00318.html (8,476 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Towers, and bedrock (score: 1): Author: "Richard Elizondo" <relizondo@ionoscom.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 23:54:54 -0600; Joe had the right idea, and seems to have done a great job from the pictures on his website. The method used by Joe is what is known as an "above ground attached gravity block". We have used it a few; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00328.html (10,744 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]