Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Towers\s+and\s+property\s+values\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Towers and property values (score: 1)
Author: Alan NV8A <nv8a@att.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:22:58 -0500
It just occurred to me to look at this issue differently. I have read that one reason municipalities demand building permits is that they can up the value of a property based on the improvements and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00450.html (7,312 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Towers and property values (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on TowerTalk" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:27:11 -0500
Here in the Midland (MI) area it varies by township. In Homer township where I live a building permit is required only if the tower will be taller than 80 feet. They will accept the engineering spec
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00452.html (9,073 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Towers and property values (score: 1)
Author: <hdmc38@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:51:47 -0500
Hello Alan. I have not heard off a tower raising the appraised value of property,but with government anything is possible.It does have to do with money.If your state adopt a building code the municip
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00454.html (10,351 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Towers and property values (score: 1)
Author: William Q Meeker <wqmeeker@iastate.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:09:03 -0600
I had heard that another ham in town, after securing a permit for a 150 foot tower, did have his assessment increased (Story County, Iowa). I do not recall if he appealed or not. After we built our
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00456.html (10,198 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Towers and property values (score: 1)
Author: Alan NV8A <nv8a@att.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:23:01 -0500
I was just asking out of curiosity. People sometimes complain that a tower will lower their property values, so I was wondering whether there were any cases of towers doing the opposite. 73 Alan NV8A
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00457.html (9,371 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Towers and property values (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:31:31 -0800 (PST)
When I have gotten permits for towers or other buildings, the taxing authority has simply mechanically increased the valuation by the amount of construction cost, which must be declared on the permit
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00458.html (9,568 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Towers and property values (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:35:27 -0000
Its probably not because of my tower farm, but my property value has gone up every time its been reviewed for the last 23 years. Having towers sure hasn't lowered the value, at least according to the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00459.html (10,902 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Towers and property values (score: 1)
Author: Bill Gillenwater <gillie@pa.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:28:10 -0500
I had a tower in 11 yards of concrete with all the accessories, for 4 years. I put in a pool and the assessor showed up the next month. Don't think they were impressed with the tower. 73 Bill n' ____
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00460.html (12,216 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Towers and property values (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 04:39:49 +0000
Alan et al: I posted the following a few months after I erected my tower in my backyard: http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00621.html . Was my increaased assessment due
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00468.html (9,613 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu