Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Towers\s+for\s+large\s+quads\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Towers for large quads (score: 1)
Author: Daniel Hileman <n9wx@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 02:16:31 +0000
Hi Everyone, I am planning on putting up a Cubex Mantis II 4 ele on 20 through 10 and 2 elements on 40m. This is a large antenna...23 sq foot. I am planning on putting it at about 100' on possibly Ro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00209.html (7,199 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Towers for large quads (score: 1)
Author: Mirko S57AD <miroslav.sibilja@amis.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 13:57:02 +0100
Try ANWireless HHD100 100' selfstanding tower... I don't have any, but just saw specs the other day... 73 Mirko, S57AD _______________________________________________ ________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00210.html (8,900 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Towers for large quads (score: 1)
Author: el34guy@aol.com via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 13:21:31 GMT
Maybe Rohn ssv. I had sections 7, 6, 5, 4 for 80ft in 23 yards of concrete. I had a large log cell yagi on it. You would have to calculate it out though. I think you can find the rohn ssv specs onlin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00211.html (9,195 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Towers for large quads (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 08:25:14 -0500
This antenna is not huge. I am sure that AN Wireless, Rohn SSV and possibly Trylon have freestanding towers of adequate size. The antenna may be a little too high on 10m and stacking certainly would
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00212.html (8,014 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Towers for large quads (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth Goodwin" <krgoodwin@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 14:07:28 -0500
The Rohn SSV self-supporting tower series is a 400 foot tower that can be custom designed to accommodate any load at any height (obviously a reasonable load at less than 400 feet). Rohn will do (at l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00213.html (9,086 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Towers for large quads (score: 1)
Author: Howard Hoyt <hhoyt@mebtel.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 13:35:58 -0400
Hi Ken! In a previous posting you described owning an SSV...what foundation type did you go with? I have 120' of SSV I am planning to erect, but I'm having trouble finding a company which can do a be
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00215.html (7,891 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu