Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Traped\s+antenna\s+for\s+2\:1\s+freq\s+range\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Traped\s+antenna\s+for\s+2\:1\s+freq\s+range\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Traped antenna for 2:1 freq range (score: 1): Author: S56A@S55TCP.ampr.org (Marijan Miletic); Date: Mon, 11 Aug 97 22:15:23 EDT; LB, W4RNL was giving advice on traped dipole for 160m and 80m and sugests using trap on 3.4 MHz in order to equalize the gain. It sounds to me as M$ science. One can hardly expect shortened 160m dipo; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00403.html (7,345 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Traped antenna for 2:1 freq range (score: 1): Author: cebik@utkux.utcc.utk.edu (L. B. Cebik); Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 07:59:39 -0400 (EDT); I rarely reply to such notes, but in this case, perhaps we can dispel some misconceptions so that no one will think a. that any laws of physics are being violated (although I do not see any evidence; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00410.html (13,693 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]