Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tri\-Ex\s+HS\s+588\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tri\-Ex\s+HS\s+588\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tri-Ex HS 588 (score: 1): Author: "charles mcneil" <calchuck@hughes.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:20:47 -0700; I am building a wind generator and have bought a Tri-Ex HS 588 tower from a neighbor. This was evidently a three section 58' crank-up tower but the top section was missing. I want to weld in some sup; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00772.html (7,159 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Tri-Ex HS 588 (score: 1): Author: "Dan Hearn" <dhearn@air-pipe.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 07:07:24 -0800; Chuck you were very wise to ask your questions before starting down a path with certain failure at the end. I am not familiar with the particular tower you have but I am reasonably sure it is similar; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00773.html (9,908 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Tri-Ex HS 588 (score: 1): Author: ersmar@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:13:14 +0000; Chuck: Guying what is supposed to be a self-supporting structure like that is not a good idea. In heavy winds, the upwind guy wire(s) will pull down on the structure to keep it upright. A crank-up to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00774.html (9,767 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Tri-Ex HS 588 (score: 1): Author: el34guy@aol.com; Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:00:59 -0500; Hi Chuck, Im not the best resource to answer this question but I do own both a crankup and a fixed freestanding tower. To be honest I dont think a crankup is your best choice for the load you are wan; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00776.html (9,673 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Tri-Ex HS 588 (score: 1): Author: KJ6Y@aol.com; Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:37:23 EST; Chuck, The HS-588 was a 88 ft 5 section, crank up and guyed tower. Weighs 780 lbs. Top section is 13 7/8" and will accept CDR and other rotors and a small prop pitch mootor mounted inside. You crank; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00777.html (7,303 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Tri-Ex HS 588 (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 07:46:41 -0800; water pipe is basically cold rolled steel, and pretty soft, and is not made for structural purposes (not that it can't be used.. it can.. but it's not specified for it, so you have to do a pretty con; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00781.html (10,155 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Tri-Ex HS 588 (score: 1): Author: "K8RI on TowerTalk" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:57:37 -0500; Chuck, Jim Gave you some good advise and an Engineer is going to cost some money. In what part of the country are you located? Electrical costs vary widely. In the mid west it's a fraction of the 30; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00782.html (9,311 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]