Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tri\s+Ex\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tri Ex (score: 1)
Author: dwindk3bhj@fuse.net (David J. Windisch)
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 06:25:19 -0500
Aside from concealedcarry, imagine how civil it would be on the highways if everyone hadda post home adr/fone# on the sides/f/b of vehicles ... a/o if statelicplatelists were publicly accessible -- -
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00003.html (6,903 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Tri Ex (score: 1)
Author: StrabDoc@aol.com (StrabDoc@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 19:38:40 EST
TowerTalk is not, in my view, an appropriate vehicle to claw anyone unless the person doing the clawing does so with an identity disclosure. You yourself have disclosed your identity as NA1I which i
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00000.html (8,299 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Tri Ex (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 01:28:17 +0000
this or call note that is so. NO I strongly disagree. The custom of signing one's name and call-sign is an important part of retaining civility on these reflectors. Just compare with USENET, where an
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00001.html (8,711 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Tri Ex (score: 1)
Author: StrabDoc@aol.com (StrabDoc@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 06:42:16 EST
<< I was under the impression commercials were not allowed. Au contraire. We're always interested in what the manufacturers and dealers have to say. After all, EVERYTHING we talk about on TowerTalk i
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00552.html (8,075 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Tri Ex (score: 1)
Author: wa2moe@doitnow.com (Stu Greene)
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 14:07:32 -0700
If you have a problem with a manufacturer or dealer, your credibility would be enhanced if you revealed your identity with an amateur radio call or a name. It's quite likely that you have a reason fo
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00558.html (8,472 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Tri Ex (score: 1)
Author: na1i@portone.com (BUBS)
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 17:14:29 -0500
Stew, I am not aware of any reason why someone has to post his or her call on this or any reflector, many do as a courtesy and because they like too see their call letters flash by, sort of a need fo
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00560.html (9,969 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Tri Ex (score: 1)
Author: wa2moe@doitnow.com (Stu Greene)
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 16:06:53 -0700
If you read the previous postings (you might have to go to the archives), it seemed to me that StrabDoc@aol.com was taking a cheap and anonymous shot at a respected vendor of amateur towers. The addr
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00564.html (9,241 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Tri Ex (score: 1)
Author: K2we@aol.com (K2we@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 18:55:03 EST
Hi All, If you feel you had a bad experience, explain what happened. I know there are a lot of people who don't care for Joel, K2QBV but he's always been a gentleman to me and I believe he should be
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00567.html (7,581 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu