Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TriEx\s+$Tashjian$\s+Tower\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TriEx\s+$Tashjian$\s+Tower\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] TriEx (Tashjian) Tower (score: 1): Author: "Edward F. Patla" <wb9wyi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 07:59:02 -0800 (PST); I have the opportunity to purchase a used W 51 TriEx telescoping tower. The problem is I will need the engineering specs with the wet stamp before I can get a building permit from the village. Does a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00446.html (6,811 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] TriEx (Tashjian) Tower (score: 1): Author: Dino Darling <dino@k6rix.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:05:39 -0700; I seem to have this discussion with people almost weekly. Trying to get a used tower spec-ed is ALMOST impossible. Even if you pick up a tower from someone who HAS the original documentation, its so; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00449.html (8,360 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] TriEx (Tashjian) Tower (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:12:18 -0800; Now that's an interesting concept. I don't know that the engineering calculations for a new tower would be appropriate for a "used" tower. Other jurisdictions and engineers may differ, but I know tha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00451.html (8,440 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] TriEx (Tashjian) Tower (score: 1): Author: Dino Darling <dino@k6rix.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:24:19 -0700; In that case... http://www.tashtowers.com/pdf/WT51-01.pdf Dino - K6RIX dino@k6rix.com _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00453.html (7,259 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]