Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tribander\s+Traps\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tribander\s+Traps\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tribander Traps (score: 1): Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>; Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 15:44:57 -0500; I actually measured the pattern of my TH7 and its replacement, a JK Mid-Tri, under exactly the same conditions. The TH7 pattern actually looked a bit better, with better f/b. I can't compare forward; /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-09/msg00325.html (10,566 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Tribander Traps (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:01:54 -0700; On all bands? And yes, better F/B doesn't necessarily mean better forward gain. 73, Dave AB7E 73, Scott K9MA On 9/12/2019 15:41, David Gilbert wrote: You know that power loss doesn't equate to lost; /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-09/msg00326.html (11,878 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Tribander Traps (score: 1): Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>; Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 16:26:28 -0500; Yes, all three bands. My point is that, forward gain aside, the TH7 had a very "nice" looking pattern. That was obvious just from using it, too. 73, Scott K9MA On all bands? And yes, better F/B doesn; /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-09/msg00327.html (12,718 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Tribander Traps (score: 1): Author: Larry K4AB <larry.k4ab@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 16:51:23 -0500; The TH-7 is a very under appreciated antenna. Read some of the reviews on eham.net Particularly one from W3JK. Are they state-of-the-art? Of course not. But they still work great multiple decades aft; /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-09/msg00329.html (14,112 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]