Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tribander\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tribander\s+question\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tribander question (score: 1): Author: mdbrown@iquest.net (Mike K9MI); Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:00:31 -0500; This is a "what if" question, as I don't have the funds to do this right now anyway. But, maybe sometime in 2001... Right now, I'm using at TH3 tribander at 40 feet. Has anyone replaced a similar ant; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00163.html (7,576 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Tribander question (score: 1): Author: k9yh@arrl.net (Bob); Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:31:31 -0600; Mike, at my previous house, I had a Mosley TA-33 @ 45'. I live in the black hole of Northern Indiana. After using it for 3 years, I replaced it with a C-3 @45' in 1997. I don't have any scientific f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00164.html (8,615 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Tribander question (score: 1): Author: k0xm@kc.rr.com (Chuck Kraly); Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 17:49:47 -0600; Mike, I replaced at TA33 with a C3SS and it is a MAJOR difference. Go for it!!! You won't regret it at all. Chuck/K0XM -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk Submissions: towertalk@co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00176.html (8,304 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Tribander question (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 20:27:52 -0500; Hi Bob, Everyone has to weigh their operating against what the antenna does. I'm not speaking of one antenna over another because I have no preference, I don't use tribanders. That's a tough call, is; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00178.html (9,731 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Tribander question (score: 1): Author: edbruns@juno.com (Edward L Bruns); Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 00:00:08 -0500; I would think the easiest way to settle the 'tri-bander vs whatever' debate would be to have both installed at the same time..same lengths of new, like feedline, same height above the ground, etc. Th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00187.html (8,066 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Tribander question (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 05:30:37 -0600; The TH3 has a 14 ft boom which is only 0.2 WL on 20M, 0.3 WL on 15M, and 0.4 WL on 10M. The maximum gain for a FULL SIZE 3L20 on a 0.2 WL boom is close to 7.0 dBi which is also the maximum gain for a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00190.html (9,357 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Tribander question (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (thompson@mindspring.com); Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:54:13 -0500; Some of us have no recourse but to use tri-banders. I did have a stack of KLM beams (6 el 10, 5 el 15, 5 el 20) that was replaced by the KT34XA in 1981. For the peace of mind I can't tell too much di; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00201.html (8,131 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Tribander question (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:36:22 EST; Well, actually we did that. All except the six or seven months part. N0AX and I tested on-the-air over a dozen different tribanders and compared their gains to a dipole along with a bunch of other me; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00215.html (8,338 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]