Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tuner\s+Loss\s+\-\s+Do\s+Not\s+Panic\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tuner\s+Loss\s+\-\s+Do\s+Not\s+Panic\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tuner Loss - Do Not Panic (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 15:04:20 -0800 (PST); Hold the phone, guys... Almost any tuner can be put in a situation where it is trying to match extreme loads. In these cases, efficiency will be less than if it's trying to perform an "easy" match.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00338.html (11,848 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Tuner Loss - Do Not Panic (score: 1): Author: jfleming@shelbynet.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 23:01:20 -0500; Following this thread with interest for 2 reasons: 1) I have recently used a couple of different tuners in several configurations with "long dipoles" (several combinations of open wire, outside balun; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00350.html (10,501 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Tuner Loss - Do Not Panic (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 06:57:24 -0600; GREAT POST Ward ! Thanks for taking the time to explain the basics. 73, Tom N4KG ___________________________________________________________________ Get the Internet just the way you want it. Free so; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00356.html (7,139 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Tuner Loss - Do Not Panic (score: 1): Author: W4EF@pacbell.net (Michael Tope); Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 07:54:49 -0800; John, First of all, a quarter dB of loss in the tuner would be 50 watts of dissipation when running 900 watts total output, so it doesn't take much loss to produce noticeable heating. As far as the l; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00362.html (11,185 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]