Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Two\s+Inverted\s+\"Vs\"\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Two Inverted "Vs" (score: 1)
Author: "Graham Dacombe" <zl3nz@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:12:03 +1300
Greetings from Waikuku Beach, New Zealand. I have two Fan Inverted "Vs" each has a 160 wire on the top with the 80 meter wire slung just below it. One runs North/West by South/East and the other one
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00626.html (7,754 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Two Inverted "Vs" (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:30:59 -0500
How high are they? What are they suspended from? What other stuff is nearby (trees, buildings, poles, metal stuff?) What type of coax are you using? Length ? What gauge wire are the elements? I think
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00627.html (7,761 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Two Inverted "Vs" (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:54:50 -0700
Not knowing the height but guessing they are not over very high for 160m, an inverted V at low heights will be fairly omni directional. Without more info it is hard to speculate. "A slip of the foot
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00628.html (8,411 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Two Inverted "Vs" (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:07:30 -0700
Too low to see any real directivity. You might be better off with an Inverted L for 160 or trying to feed the tower if you have some beams on top. "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00629.html (8,775 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Two Inverted "Vs" (score: 1)
Author: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:22:40 -0800
In years past I used a pair of 80 and 160 "inverted V" antennas with the apex at 60 feet., fed by a single coax. The ends were about 10 feet high. They were pretty low, obviously. They loaded easily
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00630.html (9,081 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu