Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+US\s+Towers\s+TX\-472MDPL\s+Remote\s+Control\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] US Towers TX-472MDPL Remote Control (score: 1)
Author: WD0M <wd0m@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 14:11:42 -0700
Would anyone using the US Towers TX-472 with the motorized system let me know if there is an alternative to purchasing the remote control kit from US Towers to raise/lower the tower from the shack? B
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00010.html (7,129 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] US Towers TX-472MDPL Remote Control (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <w8aef@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 22:04:07 -0000
I have a remote control Triex LM-470 which work very well and I like very much. Make sure whatever you use has a positive pull down. If for any reason the cables go slack during the lowering process
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00012.html (8,452 bytes)

3. RE: [TowerTalk] US Towers TX-472MDPL Remote Control (score: 1)
Author: Ve6wz_Steve <ve6wz@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 16:43:45 -0700
Also, I have seen six US Towers that have the motor driving a worm drive which in turn drives a chain that drives the cable drum. One of the 89 foot towers came down on me when the chain broke - a $1
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00013.html (8,389 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] US Towers TX-472MDPL Remote Control (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Warnock" <k7xn@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 16:53:28 -0700
The upside of operating the raising/lowering from towerside is watching that feeders and rotor cables don't get caught or pinched. Good luck, Mike Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00014.html (9,333 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] US Towers TX-472MDPL Remote Control (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 15:55:11 -0800
Bear in mind that when you remote control something that you cannot see, you need to have some basic safety precautions in place, like interlocks and position feedback. A friend has a crank up tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00015.html (9,824 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] US Towers TX-472MDPL Remote Control (score: 1)
Author: WD0M <wd0m@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 17:07:53 -0700
I failed to mention that my tower is fully visible from the very large window in the shack. Many folks have suggested that I rethink the wisdom of controlling a tower sight unseen. And they have a go
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00016.html (9,507 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] US Towers TX-472MDPL Remote Control (score: 1)
Author: "Mel Whitten" <mel@melwhitten.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 19:44:33 -0600
One or more cameras with mics will allow you to monitor the tower as it is lowered and rasied. There are a number of B&W and Color cameras available with audio that withstand harsh wx conditions. I b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00018.html (11,712 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] US Towers TX-472MDPL Remote Control (score: 1)
Author: WD0M <wd0m@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 09:23:36 -0700
A good thought Mel - hadn't gotten around to thinking of that option! 73, Joe WD0M At 06:44 PM 11/1/2003, Mel Whitten wrote: One or more cameras with mics will allow you to monitor the tower as it is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00026.html (9,018 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] US Towers TX-472MDPL Remote Control (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <w8aef@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 17:39:02 -0000
Only if you think there is any possibility of that chain breaking. de Paul, W8AEF -- ZF2TA FO8DX FO0PLA 8Q7AA XZ0A -- Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00029.html (10,118 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu