Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Unique\s+Short\s+Radial\s+Challenge\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Unique\s+Short\s+Radial\s+Challenge\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Unique Short Radial Challenge (score: 1): Author: "Eric Hilding" <b38@hilding.com>; Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:06:40 -0700; OK, this is the where I get to confess my remaining ignorance about radials and matching devices on shortened verticals. I have a ?Unique Short Radial Challenge? for an upcoming 160m portable situati; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00468.html (8,358 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Unique Short Radial Challenge (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 12:29:43 -0700; Rick, maybe the experts will correct me, but I don't think symmetry is particularly important for a radial system. You should get better performance in whichever direction you have more and longer ra; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00469.html (11,243 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Unique Short Radial Challenge (score: 1): Author: "Richard HIll" <rehill@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:55:28 -0700; I asked this question in a different way recently (if you have limited space and obstacles is it useful to make sure that radials in key directions such as to Europe or Japan are closest to ideal len; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00481.html (12,406 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]