Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Using\s+CATV\s+splitters\s+at\s+HF\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Using\s+CATV\s+splitters\s+at\s+HF\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Using CATV splitters at HF (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:17:56 -0500; Has anyone ever measured what happens to insertion loss and isolation with a modern 6-way TV splitter on 160meters? I am still working on the problem of putting 6 paralleled BPFs at the input of my Q; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00213.html (7,185 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Using CATV splitters at HF (score: 1): Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 04:10:51 -0800; The typically fall apart pretty quick, Pete. It's been many years since I've worked in that business, but the designs I've measured use just enough inductance to provide acceptable performance at 5 M; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00215.html (7,801 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]