Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Using\s+Stubs\s+to\s+Reject\s+Harmonics\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Using Stubs to Reject Harmonics (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 20:24:47 EST
Hi Paul, I think you are confusing impedance and resistance here. There is an infinite number of resistance and reactance combinations that will equal 50 ohms impedance but the only ones with low vsw
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00072.html (11,116 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] Using Stubs to Reject Harmonics (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 20:43:37 -0500
Heath SB-1000 and Ameritron AL-80 are pi-L on 160 & 80, pi above that. SB-200/SB201/SB-220/SB-221, Drake L4 and L7 are pi-network. Ameritron ALS-600 is a solid state amp with lowpass filter outputs (
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00074.html (13,259 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] Using Stubs to Reject Harmonics (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Hargrave" <w5ifp@gvtc.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:53:19 -0800
Dentron Clipperton-L is pi-network on all bands. * 73's Jim W5IFP * w5ifp@gvtc.com _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing li
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00075.html (14,024 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] Using Stubs to Reject Harmonics (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 21:07:45 -0500
No confusion. To achieve that 50 +j0 result at the source end of a 1/8-wave line still requires a 50 +j0 termination. However, no matter what is happening on the load end of the line and as long as
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00076.html (9,491 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] Using Stubs to Reject Harmonics (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:50:19 -0800
That would be some pretty awful coax -- Belden's RG8X (9258) is only 6.6dB/100 ft at 400 MHz, and a decent RG8-sized coax is on the order of 3dB/100 ft. Yes, an infinitely long line looks like a resi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00094.html (8,969 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] Using Stubs to Reject Harmonics (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 01:35:17 -0800
Looks like solid dielectric RG-213 is about 5dB/100' at 432 MHz, Jim. Gerald, you must have lost a factor of 2 somewhere (200' ft of RG-213 would have 10dB one-way loss). Coax with a foamed polyethyl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00095.html (9,424 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] Using Stubs to Reject Harmonics (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 06:32:47 EST
Jim, you are right, it was a 200 ft length for 432 MHz and 100 ft for higher frequencies. This is a great application for old RG8 coax that has gone bad. 200ft of new RG213 measures right at 4.5 dB/1
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00096.html (10,246 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] Using Stubs to Reject Harmonics (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 06:37:25 EST
You are exactly right Mike. Most of my measurements have been on 1296 MHz in recent years and that is where the 100ft cable is used. I use two 100ft cables for 432MHz, 73, Gerald K5GW In a message da
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00097.html (9,101 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu