Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Utility\s+Pole\s+as\s+Beam\s+Support\s*$/: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Utility Pole as Beam Support (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Baughn" <baughn@centurylink.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 08:51:10 -0400
Clay, Reference the building dept issue you might want to start by looking up your local ordinances that deal with building regulation and see what language they use. Some years back the municipality
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00053.html (16,087 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] Utility Pole as Beam Support (score: 1)
Author: "Gary J - N5BAA" <qltfnish@omniglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 08:53:27 -0500
" I know amateur antennas below 61' are exempt from zoning in my county, Benton, WA; but don't know about the BUILDING Dept. When I did my HyGain AV18HT (24' tower with a 24' mast); the Building Dept
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00054.html (15,500 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] Utility Pole as Beam Support (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 08:54:25 -0600
Most of these gov't agencies are out for themselves. I have no idea why people think they are out to help us. Ask them to show you the laws and regulations that give them this power. Mike W0MU Refere
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00055.html (16,987 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] Utility Pole as Beam Support (score: 1)
Author: Mickey Baker <fishflorida@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 12:05:21 -0400
Mike, I've spent a lot of my career servicing government agencies and spent time as director of technology for a county government. Like any workplace, 20% of the employees do 80% of the work. I don'
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00056.html (22,443 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] Utility Pole as Beam Support (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 10:33:12 -0600
I guess you have had better luck with government employees than I have. When I put up my first tower there were zero regulations about it. A neighbor complained and the county fired off a letter that
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00057.html (23,436 bytes)

26. [TowerTalk] Utility Pole as Beam Support (score: 1)
Author: Spencer <k5gak@powerc.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 11:15:12 -0600
that would make a great gin pole for a real tower with a tilt base. Spencer W1GAK _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing lis
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00058.html (8,409 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] Utility Pole as Beam Support (score: 1)
Author: "David Jordan" <wa3gin@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 13:23:48 -0400
Oh Mike, Gosh it can't be that bad... I work for a local government.. when I started here many years ago there were few if any employees that understood radio, cell, RF, anything about our hobby. Lot
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00059.html (26,176 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] Utility Pole as Beam Support (score: 1)
Author: "Clay Jackson" <n7qnm-lists@nwlink.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 12:04:37 -0700
Thanks guys! I have Frank's book, great reference. Talked to the Building Dept - as long as it's done according to "Utility" standards (10% of length +2' in the ground, NO concrete), all they want is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00060.html (23,712 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] Utility Pole as Beam Support (score: 1)
Author: "donhall161" <donhall161@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 14:53:15 -0500
Clay, Congratulations on acquiring the pole. I had one as my first beam antenna support and enjoyed it. Have fun! 73 Don K5AQ _______________________________________________ _________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00063.html (10,202 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] Utility Pole as Beam Support (score: 1)
Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 16:02:49 -0400
Here are the two QST references to mounting a beam on a pole. These can be found under search for articles in the members only section of the ARRL WEB. I used the 1957 method. a.. May 1968 - QST (Pg.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00064.html (10,129 bytes)

31. [TowerTalk] Utility Pole as Beam Support (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 02:47:11 -0700
Thanks guys! I have Frank's book, great reference. Talked to the Building Dept - as long as it's done according to "Utility" standards (10% of length +2' in the ground, NO concrete), all they want is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00067.html (9,492 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] Utility Pole as Beam Support (score: 1)
Author: "Clay Jackson" <n7qnm-lists@nwlink.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:04:18 -0700
Yeah - the folks here in Benton County, WA are actually pretty reasonable - turns out my pole only needs a site plan, a certification that Im gonna follow BSPs, $69 and a setback inspection (if it fa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00131.html (30,932 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] Utility Pole as Beam Support (score: 1)
Author: "Clay Jackson" <n7qnm-lists@nwlink.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:06:04 -0700
Thanks, Dave! Yet another reason why everyone should join ARRL. Clay N7QNM Here are the two QST references to mounting a beam on a pole. These can be found under search for articles in the members on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00132.html (10,953 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu