Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+V\s+beam\s+leg\s+lengths\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+V\s+beam\s+leg\s+lengths\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] V beam leg lengths (score: 1): Author: Chuck Gerarden <cgerarden@atomix.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 21:27:59 -0600; I am designing a V beam system with 4 legs radiating out from my 80 meter tower, parallel to the ground. any 2 of the 4 wires can be selected by relays for correct apex angle based on frequency. I am; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00274.html (7,431 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] V beam leg lengths (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 21:31:20 -0700; Sorry, but any wire 100's of feet long will interact on 80 meters, and you can't get around that by making it any particular multiple of a 1/4 wave, etc. Model on EZNEC and you will see the bad news.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00275.html (9,214 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] V beam leg lengths (score: 1): Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 21:30:17 -0700; I had a 50 foot v beam up at about 70 feet for several years but finally took it down because my triband yagi perforned better (except 40m). Its apex angle was fixed at about 50 degrees. That apex an; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00276.html (9,478 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] V beam leg lengths (score: 1): Author: "David J. Sourdis - HK1A" <hk1kxa@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 08:43:20 -0500; KP7UC wrote:"I dont understand what your design of the "enclosed angle ...is about 30-35 degrees ...for a correct apex angle.." means?"The legs of a Vee are long wires. Long wires antennas have the r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00279.html (10,200 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]