Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Vacuum\s+variable\s+\/\s+inductor\s+ratings\s+for\s+shunt\s+fed\s+tower\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Vacuum variable / inductor ratings for shunt fed tower (score: 1)
Author: "Allen R. Brier" <n5xz@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:00:38 -0800
What are the minimum ratings required for a vacuum variable used to shunt feed a tower (used at full legal limit plus some head room)? I would like to shunt feed my 70 foot tower with a 4 el SteppIR
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00268.html (7,560 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Vacuum variable / inductor ratings for shunt fed tower (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:06:48 -0500
I wouldn't recommend using the SteppIR elements as a capacity hat. The elements are insulated from the boom and most of them won't add a lot a capacity. The driven element has a 2 to 1 balun. It also
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00277.html (11,567 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Vacuum variable / inductor ratings for shunt fed tower (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
I don't agree with "a 2 to 1 balun ... also does a choke function". First of all, the impedance ratio is 9 to 4, and the turns ratio is 3 to 2. Second, all "current baluns" or "common mode chokes" ar
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00284.html (9,162 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Vacuum variable / inductor ratings for shunt fed tower (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:25:38 -0500
N6RK wrote: "I spent a lot of time analyzing the balun in my MonstIR and characterizing it on a network analyzer." I have always wondered how well that thing worked. They use half of the core for a v
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00296.html (10,083 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Vacuum variable / inductor ratings for shunt fed tower (score: 1)
Author: "D.G." <indianaj0nes@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:36:32 -0700 (PDT)
Can you hear the scanner in the background of this video ?   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9M-XEqjfbs   N9FAA   N6RK wrote: "I spent a lot of time analyzing the balun in my MonstIR and characterizi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00297.html (9,959 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Vacuum variable / inductor ratings for shunt fed tower (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:25:07 -0700
I didn't measure it as a common mode choke because I thought it was a voltage balun. The fact that the coax is one of the windings does not necessarily indicate that it is a common mode choke. Rick N
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00298.html (8,722 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Vacuum variable / inductor ratings for shunt fed tower (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 01:09:37 -0500
The balun is an unusual design. It's a combo 22 to 50 ohm unun plus a common mode choke. Most people say that won't work. However if you look at what they did it almost makes sense. The unun part is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00303.html (10,202 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Vacuum variable / inductor ratings for shunt fed tower (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
It's that old gag: it depends on what you mean by "works". It will work in terms of operating the SteppIR whether it is a voltage balun or a current balun. So that fact that it works for that purpose
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00313.html (10,299 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu