Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Vertical\s+Antenna\s+Close\s+to\s+Fresh\s+Water\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Vertical\s+Antenna\s+Close\s+to\s+Fresh\s+Water\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Vertical Antenna Close to Fresh Water (score: 1): Author: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:27:41 -0800 (PST); There was a short discussion a while ago on whether a vertical was better ground mounted fed against ground radials or up in the air fed against resonant radials. The general consensus was that 'up i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00222.html (7,790 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical Antenna Close to Fresh Water (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <aa5jg@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:28:33 -0800 (PST); The most recent issue of National Contest Journal ran an article about verticals and ground losses. It found that even with 120 radials, ground losses are fairly significant on 40m and below, at leas; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00228.html (9,834 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]