Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Vertical\s+array\s+applications\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Vertical\s+array\s+applications\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Vertical array applications (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:21:26 EST; Interesting to see how others are using their arrays. I never thought of putting up an array for just a receive system, but what a great idea I have a lot of respect for hams who put in the time to p; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00401.html (8,170 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Vertical array applications (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:58:59 -0500; positive I agree that use of 4-squares for RX antennas (or even more complex arrays, for that matter, like W8JI's) is a sweet idea. Anything vertical also simplifies the interstation interference pro; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00404.html (9,475 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Vertical array applications (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:32:56 EST; That's a lot of gain for a dipole. Are you including ground gain? I think that's the only way you could do that since a dipole is something like 1.5 dB over an isotropic. Cheers, Steve K7LXC Tower Te; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00407.html (7,737 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Vertical array applications (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:48:33 EST; Here we must be hitting on discrepancies between theory (modeling programs, some books) and reality. Using "crummy" 2 el. parasitic verticals and dysfunctional 3 el. triangular array sitting on the b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00412.html (8,047 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Vertical array applications (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:35:27 -0500; Nope, models and the real world coincide pretty well -- as N6BT, K2KW et al have shown, the verticals on the beach are a VERY special case. I carefully stipulated ground conditions in my comments. Pu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00421.html (8,553 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Vertical array applications (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:27:47 -0500; think dB ~2.2 actually -- but that's the whole point -- ground reflection gain is what works for the horizontal antenna, and its absence hurts the verticals. 73, Pete N4ZR Contesting is! The World Co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00422.html (8,264 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Vertical array applications (score: 1): Author: w7why@harborside.com (Tom Osborne); Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 04:21:29 -0800; Hi Yuri Amen to that!! I don't know what the gain of my 40 meter array is and I don't care. All I know is it works like gangbusters. If I had an array that worked as well as it does, on every band, I; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00496.html (7,807 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]