Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Verticals\s+and\s+Vertical\s+Dipoles\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Verticals\s+and\s+Vertical\s+Dipoles\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Verticals and Vertical Dipoles (score: 1): Author: Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 15:41:15 -0800; I had a 40m vertical dipole up a couple of years ago. I took it down last year because of poor performance (ie. worse than my 40m dipole at 40 feet). Can someone give me some possible reasons for why; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00068.html (7,591 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Verticals and Vertical Dipoles (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 16:04:08 -0800; Several things affect the perceived performance. All, some or none may apply in your case: 1) You still have ground loss from the near fields interacting with the ground (i.e. the electric and magnet; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00069.html (9,567 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Verticals and Vertical Dipoles (score: 1): Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 22:13:30 -0500; I have two Mor-Gain short dipoles mounted vertically. The top part is pure vertical and the bottom half is sloped (65 degrees) to the NE on one and to the SW on the other. The antennas are elevated 1; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00078.html (9,566 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]