Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Very\s+very\s+very\s+large\s+loop\s+antenna\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Very very very large loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: "johne tds.net" <johne@tds.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:55:12 -0600
I am recovering from spine surgery and have been thinking about a Very very very large loop antenna as most of us have ! Is a formula available for this that would incorporate the height above ground
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00313.html (6,842 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Very very very large loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: n8de@thepoint.net
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:08:48 -0500
Can't answer your question, John, but was wondering where you would find the 200+ supports to hold up the loop? 73 Don N8DE _______________________________________________ ___________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00314.html (7,862 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Very very very large loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:57:59 -0500
!!!!!!!!!! The pattern is remarkably weird. I tried a square loop at 50 feet above "average" ground on 160m and 80m, fed in the middle of one side. http://n3ox.net/files/hugeloop.jpg It's basically
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00316.html (8,123 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Very very very large loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:15:30 -0700
That radiation pattern may look weird for an antenna but it looks amazingly like a Roadrunner in flight. It's the state bird of New Mexico but we often see them here in Arizona as well, and since the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00317.html (8,512 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Very very very large loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:48:13 +0000
I can see no advantage in an antenna like that - even the copper loss begins to be significant. The pattern is bad enough on 160m and 80m; I can't model it on higher frequency bands because I exceed
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00319.html (7,377 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Very very very large loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:12:48 -0500
It is a little interesting that at 50 foot height, the pattern of a single 6600 foot center-fed wire has a single clean lobe on axis and the low angle gain is quite high. Might be uselessly narrow be
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00328.html (8,837 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Very very very large loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:11:29 -0700
I've seen a great many roadrunners in flight but only a very small number of them were flying north, true or otherwise, although most do seem to fly pretty much in a straight line. Assuming that I ca
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00332.html (8,593 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Very very very large loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:47:10 -0700
I'm still curious why anyone would want to put up a loop with five miles of wire in it. What was the intended purpose? VLF or something? I'm also curious how it was planned to be supported. Even with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00339.html (8,195 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Very very very large loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy Alderman" <aldermant@windstream.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:43:35 -0500
I am still curious how you are going to keep the static build-up discharged? Tom - W4BQF I'm still curious why anyone would want to put up a loop with five miles of wire in it. What was the intended
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00341.html (9,191 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Very very very large loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:08:33 -0800
There you go, you blew his cover. What he is actually planning to do is run the antenna parallel to some high tension power lines and get free electricity. If the power company gets suspicious, he ju
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00342.html (9,383 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Very very very large loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: K8RI on TT <k8ri-on-towertalk@tm.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:53:28 -0500
That sounds like one of the old country, open wire telephone lines...or a fence. 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerT
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00343.html (10,316 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Very very very large loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Mike" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:05:09 -0800
No replies from the original poster, Group Troll ?? discharged? That sounds like one of the old country, open wire telephone lines...or a fence. 73 Roger (K8RI) ______________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00344.html (11,185 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Very very very large loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Diane and Edward Swynar" <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 10:42:34 -0500
"...I am still curious how you are going to keep the static build-up discharged?" ** Hi Tom, I think two ordinary 2.5 mh. RF cokes from each individual feed wire to ground would do the trick... That'
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00352.html (9,328 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Very very very large loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 20:50:31 -0500
There was a VP2M back in the early 1970's who had a large loop but it was merely 1500 feet on a side. He was very loud on both 15 and 20. He ran Europe on 20 with ease. Dave W7FB (Ex W0MHS) also know
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00377.html (10,234 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu