Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Video\s+surveillance\s+for\s+remote\s+tower\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Video surveillance for remote tower (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Conwell \(home\)" <bill@conwellpdx.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:15:07 -0700
I'm preparing to erect a tower and antennas at a weekend retreat house that is often vacant. We haven't had any trouble leaving the place unattended to date, but I'm a bit concerned that a tall tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00246.html (7,833 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Video surveillance for remote tower (score: 1)
Author: "Robert West" <robert.west@eatmoresoap.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 01:22:17 -0400
I've installed many wireless IP cams inside but never outside although I've seen it done cheap enough. Most of the exterior IP cams I've seen are pretty expensive and have the pan, tilt and zoom (PTZ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00247.html (10,338 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Video surveillance for remote tower (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 03:05:45 -0400
If it was mine, I think I'd install a good anti-climb arrangement, put a sign on the tower warning that it is under 34-hour video surveillance, and get one of those $20 dummy video cameras to put up
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00250.html (10,421 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Video surveillance for remote tower (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:49:57 -0700
Perhaps I am giving the average criminal too much credit, but I feel there may be another dimension to this problem that goes beyond the tower. I agree that the climbing shields and a dummy camera wi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00253.html (10,534 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Video surveillance for remote tower (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:49:14 -0400
Agreed, but at least you can have a burglar alarm on the house, or take the major stuff home with you. I gather that's what CN2R does, in a considerably riskier environment <http://cn2r.net/cn2r/inde
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00256.html (12,193 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Video surveillance for remote tower (score: 1)
Author: "David Jordan" <wa3gin@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:57:22 -0400
Bill, First, do visit your local police dept. or county or state HQ, which ever applies, and talk to the folks there...they know all the repeat offenders in your area as well as the typical types of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00258.html (9,323 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Video surveillance for remote tower (score: 1)
Author: "David Jordan" <wa3gin@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:00:10 -0400
Oops, Here is a Youtube like that talks about GEOVISION technology and how to install, etc; plenty of info on the web. http://video.google.com/videosearch?sourceid=navclient&rlz=1T4GGLM_enUS316US 237
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00259.html (8,704 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Video surveillance for remote tower (score: 1)
Author: Joe - WDØM <wd0m@wd0m.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:13:56 -0600
Webcam First is a free video software program that will monitor movement and send you an e-mail of the image: http://www.webcamfirst.com/ If you want several views, it allows multiple webcams. The ne
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00262.html (9,956 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Video surveillance for remote tower (score: 1)
Author: Tony Scandurra W2WAS <w2was@att.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:09:55 -0400
Unless I missed it, you didn't mention if this was a crank-up tower. If so, why don't you just crank it down when not in use? That will probably resolve the additional attention factor. Probably safe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00263.html (8,498 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Video surveillance for remote tower (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:34:42 -0700
That's the advantage of things like the linksys camera.. lower power, all in one package, no PC to operate, etc. _______________________________________________ ______________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00264.html (8,671 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Video surveillance for remote tower (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:42:04 -0700
Yes, that is sort of what I was driving at - i.e. don't focus just on the tower itself as it may increase the threat to the property in the house. I recall reading that between contests CN2R thas to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00275.html (13,917 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu