Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+W2DU\s+Balun\s+Bead\s+Source\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source (score: 1)
Author: "R. David Eagle" <kb8nnu@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:39:37 -0800 (PST)
Howdy all...I am looking at constructing 2 W2DU bead baluns as described in ARRL Antenna book that uses 12 Amidon FB-77-1024 beads. Is there a good source to get these at a reasonable price or maybe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00350.html (7,475 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source (score: 1)
Author: "James Chaggaris" <jimc@pwrone.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:44:12 -0600
Dave: I use CWS Bytemark (http://www.bytemark.com/index.htm) I just received 12 beads SB-1024-77 from them. I think they were $1.50 each. 73's Jim N9WW James E. Chaggaris President PowerOne Corp. 102
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00351.html (8,198 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:17:21 -0600
From: "R. David Eagle" <kb8nnu@yahoo.com> Subject: [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source Howdy all...I am looking at constructing 2 W2DU bead baluns as described in ARRL Antenna book that uses 12 Amidon
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00354.html (8,084 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:23:02 -0600
There is a good discussion of baluns in the current issue of QST written by Ward Silver. The bead balun is a good choice. 73, Keith NM5G Not trying to change your mind, but you get more balun for the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00355.html (8,694 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source (score: 1)
Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:49:30 -0600
I tried a Ferrite not long ago and took it off. I had a relatively small donut piece of ferrite and placed it over the coax, I didn't wrap it or anything, just a quick test. Hoping to get rid of any
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00358.html (10,952 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source (score: 1)
Author: "R. David Eagle" <kb8nnu@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:58:48 -0800 (PST)
I've been considering making a balun (1:1) out of a FT-240-43 and RG-142 (or RG-58??), but haven't seen any real conclusive eveidence on their effectiveness. So maybe someone can share their knowledg
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00359.html (8,295 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:39:29 -0600
That should work pretty well but I would recommend RG-400 teflon for the coax. -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com _________________________________________________________________ Your Hotmail address already
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00361.html (8,436 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:23:21 -0800
VERY good advice. As it turns out, I'm about 90% done with a tutorial on RFI and ferrites that includes a discussion of baluns, a lot of measured data, and specific advice on troubleshooting RFI and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00365.html (8,648 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source (score: 1)
Author: Tim Duffy K3LR <k3lr@k3lr.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:46:32 -0600
I have used the W2DU chokes and at 1500 watts they get way too warm. I suggest the W0IYH design. I use one at the output of the amplifier and one at the feed point of every antenna. They work GREAT.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00376.html (9,731 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:20:48 -0500
This is a problem with ferrite baluns if the choking impedance is too LOW. Maybe you had amps of RF current flowing on that coax, and you put a one ohm impedance in series with it. It's not enough t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00378.html (9,377 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:36:07 -0600
The #77 material used for w2du chokes is primarily resistive and thus dissipates power. Other materials are primarily reactive and not as lossy as #77. -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com ______________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00383.html (8,548 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:34:49 -0600
Here's some good information on toroidal ferrite materials. Apparently, the FT-240-K has been optimized for baluns. http://www.amidoncorp.com/aai_ferritecores.htm -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com ___________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00386.html (8,808 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:30:23 -0600
Well I guess if no one else is going to say it, I will. The reason your balun got hot is because you put in in series with your signal not in series with common mode currents. You can't put a balun o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00392.html (13,899 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source (score: 1)
Author: "FISCHER,GREG" <ab7r@cablespeed.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:51:36 -0600
I don't remember if it was on this reflector or another, but the common mode chokes were discussed in great detail with great info from this site: http://www.yccc.org/Articles/W1HIS/CommonModeChokesW
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00393.html (15,793 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:21:28 -0600
Wow, I missed that. Jerry, you probably should change your "can't do that" statement to a "you'll be sorry if you do" statement. :-) A T-antenna turns the coax into a radiating element. One will cer
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00395.html (9,709 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:32:20 -0500
Jerry, You get the "observant TowerTalker" award. Feeling dumb, Dan _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00396.html (8,651 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source (score: 1)
Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:27:27 -0600
Ok well that makes sense, since it did get (and I mean extremely hot) so I made a mini heater for the shack. Probably a good thing I took it off :0) So the ferrite was in series with the signal path.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00397.html (16,740 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:05:57 -0600
Although it may not be readily apparent, if you short the inner connector to the outer connector on a piece of coax, zero RF current flows on the inner conductor. All the RF current flows on the out
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00399.html (9,633 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu