Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+W3LPL\s+vs\.\s+K3LR\:\s+ARRL\s+DX\s+CW\s+40m\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+W3LPL\s+vs\.\s+K3LR\:\s+ARRL\s+DX\s+CW\s+40m\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] W3LPL vs. K3LR: ARRL DX CW 40m (score: 1): Author: heatwole@clark.net (Nat Heatwole); Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 11:14:01 -0500; Looking over all of the preliminary score reports posted on 3830 I have found the following numbers to be true on 40m: Station: QSO's: Mults: -- K3LR 1595 119 W3LPL 1668 123 Using these numbers W3LPL; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00456.html (8,471 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] W3LPL vs. K3LR: ARRL DX CW 40m (score: 1): Author: ni8l@raex.com (Scott Detloff K8DX); Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 11:23:11 -0500; Hi Nat, Just to set the record straight, K3LR is almost in Western Ohio, and almost 200 miles west of 'LPL. Also the 4EL 40M Yagis really don't add much to the gain, since they are almost on the same; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00457.html (8,901 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] W3LPL vs. K3LR: ARRL DX CW 40m (score: 1): Author: heatwole@clark.net (Nat Heatwole); Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 11:32:17 -0500; Sorry for the mistake, I was thinking of KC1XX not K3LR when I wrote that K3LR was a little closer to EU. There really is not much difference in distance from EU between W3LPL and K3LR. Again sorry f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00458.html (7,746 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] W3LPL vs. K3LR: ARRL DX CW 40m (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 11:39:06 EST; Put the beer down Nat................... 73 Paul N0AH -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contestin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00459.html (7,364 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] W3LPL vs. K3LR: ARRL DX CW 40m (score: 1): Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com); Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 12:26:51 -0500; The answer is obvious: Superior operating skill! ;) "Nat Heatwole" <heatwole@clark.net> To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent by: cc: owner-towertalk@cont Subject: [TowerTalk] W3LPL vs. K3LR: ARRL DX e; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00460.html (10,050 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] W3LPL vs. K3LR: ARRL DX CW 40m (score: 1): Author: tduffy@sygnet.com (Tim Duffy); Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 11:46:49 -0600; Hi Nat! There IS quite a distance difference between W3LPL and K3LR, with LPL being much closer to Europe than LR. LR enjoys a distance advantage to Japan over LPL. As K8DX pointed out, the 4 element; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00462.html (9,908 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]