Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Was\s+Guyed\s+vs\.\s+free\-standing\,\s+now\s+aluminum\s+towers\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Was Guyed vs. free-standing, now aluminum towers (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:13:25 EDT
I had a 9-50 up for years with a KT34A on top. Moved it once to a new location. Tower was okay but won't last "forever" as the bolt holes at the leg junctions elongate over time and sections become u
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00327.html (8,244 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Was Guyed vs. free-standing, now aluminum towers (score: 1)
Author: "Alex Malyava" <alex.k2bb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:25:11 -0400
I am just wondering - If manufacturer (UT in this case) aware that aluminum legs suffer form eggholes sooner or later, why they do not make them with some sort of (stainless)steel ends? They are noth
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00332.html (8,503 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Was Guyed vs. free-standing, now aluminum towers (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:38:31 -0400
Likewise I've run into the same problem. Actually I've never seen one of the smaller aluminum towers without egg shaped holes in the legs. I'd not drill them out except to cure a *slight* egg shape,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00333.html (14,038 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Was Guyed vs. free-standing, now aluminum towers (score: 1)
Author: "Anthony J. Di Sano" <adisano@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:24:34 -0400
Misc. pics Universal HD-16-80 w/ 20 ft Mast http://picasaweb.google.com/2sc2879/FreestandingHDRadioTowerInstallation http://picasaweb.google.com/2sc2879/2k7930TowerMaintenance http://picasaweb.google
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00343.html (9,790 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu