Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+What\s+a\s+multiband\s+vertical\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+What\s+a\s+multiband\s+vertical\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] What a multiband vertical? (score: 1): Author: ok1rr@okdxc.cz (OK1RR); Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 09:47:19 +0100; Hi there, I tested many multiband vertical antennas with disappointing results so I am looking for advice to a vertical which may meet my needs: 1. Bands 40-30-20-17-15-12-10 metres, no need of a tun; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00247.html (7,751 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] What a multiband vertical? (score: 1): Author: larsenp@cadvision.com (Peter Larsen); Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 02:43:33 +0000; Hi Martin: I think you won't go too far wrong with a Butternut HF9V. I had a HF6V for a while and am still kicking myself for selling it. OTOH it went to a new ham and I was glad to help out. A frein; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00257.html (7,571 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] What a multiband vertical? (score: 1): Author: davidc@bit-net.com (DavidC); Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 21:58:18 -0500; I've used a Butternut and a Cushcraft, both work very nicely if properly situated. The Butternut seemed to prefer ground mounting and radials, and the R-7 seemed to prefer a little elevation above g; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00260.html (7,347 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]