Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+What\s+about\s+hams\s+with\s+small\s+lots\?\?\?\s*$/: 58 ]

Total 58 documents matching your query.

41. [TowerTalk] What about hams with small lots??? (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 10:08:16 -0600
gales, loops, Sorry to disagree Tim, but a LOW horizontal 1WL loop is not my idea of a good DX antenna. It IS a good high angle radiator for local coverage. On harmonic frequencies, each side behaves
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00092.html (11,665 bytes)

42. [TowerTalk] What about hams with small lots??? (score: 1)
Author: ve6yc@home.com (Peter Larsen)
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 15:43:44 +0100
All though not exactly on topic here, this statement brought back a great memory. In town here we had a 10 meter SSB net on 28.250 every evening. Lots of mobiles (vertical) and lots of base stations
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00093.html (10,636 bytes)

43. [TowerTalk] What about hams with small lots??? (score: 1)
Author: RCARIELLO@si.rr.com (RCARIELLO)
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 16:09:21 -0000
Hello to all, I am happy to see the amount of replies to the "What about hams with small lots?" question. To continue let me add some notes on my personal experiences. As stated before the antenna ar
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00095.html (11,209 bytes)

44. [TowerTalk] What about hams with small lots??? (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 13:20:17 -0600
Two dipoles, 34 ft and 100 to 140 ft, each fed with ladderline and run in the same direction, will give almost complete coverage on the higher bands. The Longer dipole will act as various types of lo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00100.html (11,525 bytes)

45. [TowerTalk] What about hams with small lots??? (score: 1)
Author: Kenneth Hirschberg" <info@cal-av.com (Kenneth Hirschberg)
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 12:41:22 -0700
You're on the right track, Rich. Compact loops, other electrically small antennas, and arrays of them will be a growing part of the future for height and / or space restricted lots, particularly for
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00102.html (14,858 bytes)

46. [TowerTalk] What about hams with small lots??? (score: 1)
Author: James.E.Brown@lrdor.usace.army.mil (Brown, James E LRDOR)
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 06:19:23 -0700
Sounds like my situation. I ended up with a small crank-up tower bracketed to the house and a 6-band 2 element quad. For 40/80, a multi-band Windom is supported from the tower on a piece of aluminum
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00123.html (14,748 bytes)

47. [TowerTalk] What about hams with small lots??? (score: 1)
Author: ei8ic@eircom.net (Tim Makins, EI8IC)
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 08:24:29 +0100
Hi Tom - thanks for your comments. Disagreements are always welcomed here - its the only way I can learn something. The 2WL loop sounds interesting, and could be used by some on the perimeter of thei
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00139.html (11,087 bytes)

48. Fw: [TowerTalk] What about hams with small lots??? (score: 1)
Author: ei8ic@eircom.net (Tim Makins, EI8IC)
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 08:32:01 +0100
performance it To: <towertalk@contesting.com> seem be of List Sponsored by AN Wireless: AN Wireless handles Rohn tower systems, Trylon Titan towers, coax, hardline and more. Also check out our self s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00140.html (13,024 bytes)

49. [TowerTalk] What about hams with small lots??? (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 20:42:05 +0200
I don't want to discuss if a one or two WL horizontal loop suspended 20/30 ft around an house is or not an efficient antenna, whose I don't think, but I've also doubts if its really suitable for smal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00142.html (11,792 bytes)

50. Fw: [TowerTalk] What about hams with small lots??? (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 17:17:43 EDT
You sumed it up real well. It's a great antenna. As I have suggested many times use 136' of open wire line or 123' of 450 ohm ladder line into a balanced tuner. If used on the funadmental band instal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00148.html (12,907 bytes)

51. Fw: [TowerTalk] What about hams with small lots??? (score: 1)
Author: alsopb@gloryroad.net (alsopb)
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 22:33:45 +0000
Once again the theory is outvoted by personal endorsements. Frankly, models can save you a lot of time by having you NOT put up something that won't be an improvement. Chances are quite good if you m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00150.html (14,525 bytes)

52. [TowerTalk] What about hams with small lots??? (score: 1)
Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson)
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 19:03:43 -0400
I keep seeing 4 squares on 80 and 165 foot towers with stacked 3 el 40 meter beams. Well I suspect that most don't have the real estate to use anything like this. What about effective antennas for th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00753.html (8,776 bytes)

53. [TowerTalk] What about hams with small lots??? (score: 1)
Author: n5nug@ix.netcom.com (Ed Goodman)
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 18:24:00 -0500
Hello David, I have been following with interest the discussion of top loading, short verticals and now small lots. Compromise is compromise... now how do you make the best of a lousy situation. That
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00754.html (9,912 bytes)

54. [TowerTalk] What about hams with small lots??? (score: 1)
Author: Ron KA4INM Youvan" <ka4inm@qsl.net (Ron KA4INM Youvan)
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 20:15:07 -0400
Hi all: An inverted "V" puts the part of the antenna with the highest current, highest in the structure and each need only one high support, two on different bands can be supported at right angles (a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00756.html (9,221 bytes)

55. [TowerTalk] What about hams with small lots??? (score: 1)
Author: Ron KA4INM Youvan" <ka4inm@qsl.net (Ron KA4INM Youvan)
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 20:18:46 -0400
Hi all: Except for the "lots of cash" part I am in the identical situation. 73 (= Best Regards) de: (= this is) Ron ka4inm@qsl.net Please visit my HAM web site at: http://www.qsl.net/ka4inm List Spon
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00757.html (8,427 bytes)

56. [TowerTalk] What about hams with small lots??? (score: 1)
Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan or Patricia Griffiths)
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 18:23:53 -0700
Do you still have a job or another hobby? They have to go . . . (You said you have plenty of money so certainly you don't need a job!) Stan w7ni@easystreet.com List Sponsored by AN Wireless: AN Wirel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00758.html (11,282 bytes)

57. [TowerTalk] What about hams with small lots??? (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 18:58:02 -0700
// In my experiences, for 160m operation from a smallish lot, the end-fed wire antenna works better than anything except a half-wave end-fed wire supported by a balloon. By feeding the antenna from
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00759.html (9,392 bytes)

58. [TowerTalk] What about hams with small lots??? (score: 1)
Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson)
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 23:43:51 -0400
Ed, The Uni-Hat vertical is a very effective vertical for 160 and 80 (I never tried it on 40 as I have the 2 el 40 and its a killer at just below 90'). The problems lie in trying to put down radials
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00761.html (10,406 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu