Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+What\s+am\s+I\s+missing\.\.\.\.balun\s*$/: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:00:51 -0800
https://www.arraysolutions.com/index.php?_route_=as-50-1din-20k What am I missing here ? Appears to be 2 turns through 6 x type 31 cores. These are standard 2.4 inch OD cores. Coax is just RG-393. Th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00344.html (7,585 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:32:18 -0800
You're not missing a thing, Jim. This emperor has no clothes. And it's $900! 73, Jim K9YC What am I missing here ? Appears to be 2 turns through 6 x type 31 cores. These are standard 2.4 inch OD core
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00345.html (8,131 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 14:59:13 -0500
It looks like more turns would be possible in that enclosure. I am curious why costs $900. John KK9A What am I missing here ? Appears to be 2 turns through 6 x type 31 cores. These are standard 2.4 i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00348.html (7,558 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun (score: 1)
Author: "Bert Almemo" <balmemo@sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 01:16:01 -0500
...and this device (choke) would give you over 30 dB attenuation from 1 to 30 MHz!! I'm definetely missing something!! How can this kind of advertising be allowed? I'm no expert but I've made a few c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00349.html (9,331 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun (score: 1)
Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 23:54:34 -0700
Not defending this at all but... there shouldn't be any, or close to no attenuation. It's a short length of high quality coax. Since they claim it's built to customer specifications, and they don't q
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00350.html (7,985 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 23:51:27 -0800
...and this device (choke) would give you over 30 dB attenuation from 1 to 30 MHz!! I'm definetely missing something!! How can this kind of advertising be allowed? I'm no expert but I've made a few c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00351.html (8,759 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun (score: 1)
Author: W4AAW@aol.com via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 07:07:09 -0500
Some years ago I noticed an advert in QST by the purveyor of a soundcard interface that claimed it could allow FSK RTTY through your soundcard! Of course this was AFSK and clearly, the advert took ad
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00352.html (10,374 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:45:49 -0400
QST also exposed the so call Max-Com balun that claimed when hooked to a dipole (length not specified) it would give less than 2:1 from 1.8 to 30 Mhz. And they were correct since that's what it did.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00353.html (8,739 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun (score: 1)
Author: Steve Bookout <steve@nr4m.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 07:57:09 -0500
Hell all, I think I agree with Wes. How else do you show a prospective customer how it is built and quality of the parts used. Since it's 'built to order', there would not be one in stock to open up
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00354.html (9,901 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun (score: 1)
Author: "ve4xt@mymts.net" <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 07:40:42 -0600
I've been trying to divine a defence for this box, but can't. If I read K9YC's choke cookbook correctly, there's no way this could achieve the level of broadband choking claimed. Moreover, not only i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00356.html (10,548 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun (score: 1)
Author: Chris <EZRhino@fastmovers.biz>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 07:41:09 -0700
Is there any chance this is an April Fool's joke? Chris _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00357.html (11,462 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 10:21:03 -0500
I have to throw this out there and its not directed at any one individual - Jay at Array Solutions is a straight shooter - I do not think he'd do something to intentionally mislead someone and/or tak
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00358.html (10,959 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun (score: 1)
Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 10:27:51 -0700
Absolutely not. The way I read the data presented, it's all about input match, which says absolutely nothing about the common mode impedance, which is the actual choking mechanism. Return loss, SWR,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00360.html (9,565 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:55:15 -0800
I've known Jay at a distance for a while, and while we don't get along, I strongly agree with your assessment. Jim Thompson's original post was cross-posted to the Amps reflector, and Jay responded t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00362.html (9,927 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 10:12:37 -0800
Is there any chance this is an April Fool's joke? Chris The unit is optimized for the 11m folks like I thought. Hence the 26.980 mhz marker on the screen. Kelly, return loss is just another way of ex
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00363.html (11,760 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun (score: 1)
Author: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 11:17:37 -0700
Just a side note, but I wouldn't be so quick to advertise that I sell components to those who violate Federal Law. 73, Dick, W1KSZ _______________________________________________ ____________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00364.html (12,903 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun (score: 1)
Author: Howard Hoyt <hhoyt@mebtel.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 13:18:14 -0500
Hi all, I know Jay Terleski and Array Solutions and like Gary - K9RX I agree AS's products are not cheap but they are well built, and I have not yet heard them called a scam outfit. AS does serve ham
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00365.html (10,565 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 13:37:33 -0500
seriously? There are amps that are sold all-day-long that will easily do 3 even 4 or more thousand watts! The statement when advertised for sale as "used" that says "to a dummy load" as if they think
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00366.html (10,221 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun (score: 1)
Author: "James Wolf" <jbwolf@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 13:41:31 -0500
This was Array Solutions response to this on the AMPS reflector. What your missing Jim is this is a Balun for the band below 10m 8o) [Ed Note: 11 meters] Where the real ampllifiers are used. We sell
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00367.html (9,947 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:38:09 -0500
Why won't PTFE coax with a tan jacket hold up outdoors? John KK9A And when you criticize the enclosure and believe it is unnecessary, you're wrong; the outer jacket on that coax would last about 15 m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00368.html (8,448 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu