Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+What\s+does\s+X\=0\s+mean\s+for\s+an\s+Antenna\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+What\s+does\s+X\=0\s+mean\s+for\s+an\s+Antenna\s+\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] What does X=0 mean for an Antenna ? (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 07:15:51 -1000; Hi Ted, The X is the reactive part of the impedance; the contribution from either inductance, were the antenna is electrically longer than the test frequency 1/2 wavelength, or capacitve were the an; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00310.html (11,580 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] What does X=0 mean for an Antenna ? (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 09:03:14 -0500; Hi Jim While that can be true, it isn't a "rule". Bandwidth is determined by more than losses. Measuring BW to determine efficiency can be very misleading. For example, my highest efficiency 160 mete; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00335.html (9,981 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]