- 1. [TowerTalk] Where did 0.6 come from? (score: 1)
- Author: kr2q@optimum.net
- Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 17:13:00 +0000 (GMT)
- 1. I am not an engineer2. Here is where I thought "0.6" came fromBack in the late 60's, when I was still in HS, the "square footage" of antennas was a hot topic.There were long discussions (in perso
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00187.html (7,863 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Where did 0.6 come from? (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 10:57:21 -0500
- Recommended reading - http://k7nv.com/notebook/topics/windload.html 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com. For spots, plea
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00189.html (10,602 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Where did 0.6 come from? (score: 1)
- Author: SPWoo <jj_2_woo@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:30:00 -0800 (PST)
- I'm not an engineer by profession; so I'm not saying that this is correct. In various software programs and Excel spreadsheets I obtained from ham-related sources use a Cd of 1.2 for round members a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00193.html (7,764 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Where did 0.6 come from? (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:34:16 -0800
- On 2/10/13 8:30 AM, SPWoo wrote: I'm not an engineer by profession; so I'm not saying that this is correct. In various software programs and Excel spreadsheets I obtained from ham-related sources use
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00196.html (9,760 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu