Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Which\s+Balun\s+with\s+the\s+TH7DXX\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Which\s+Balun\s+with\s+the\s+TH7DXX\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Which Balun with the TH7DXX (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 20:21:42 -0700; I regularly run 1500 watts RTTY contesting to my TH7 with a BN86. Works fine. I tried 8-10 turns of RG400 on a FT-240-61 core and the SWR was not nearly as good as it was with the BN-86 as Gerald has; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00450.html (12,548 bytes)
22. [TowerTalk] Which Balun with the TH7DXX (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 03:08:19 -0700; Jim, did you ever try that as a balun on the feed point of a yagi with the power level RG393 is good for? 73 Peter Jim VE7RF It comes with a type N connector. I hate Type N connectors so would not tr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00464.html (9,978 bytes)
23. [TowerTalk] Which Balun with the TH7DXX (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 03:24:47 -0700; Yes, I am pretty confident that it works on 20m. 30uH give me 2638 ohms. On the feed line I measure no common mode current either. I am using such on a 20m KLM yagi now which I converted to OWA two; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00465.html (9,629 bytes)
24. Re: [TowerTalk] Which Balun with the TH7DXX (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 19:15:26 -0700; The 2.4 inch 61 core is part number 5961003821. I use them for stack match transformers from time time or for small baluns wound with RG142. 13 turns of RG142 on a single core give me 30uH, same as m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00467.html (9,148 bytes)
25. Re: [TowerTalk] Which Balun with the TH7DXX (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>; Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:31:48 +0200; Those would have worked with the TH7, but at the time of mounting the TH7 I had no stock of FT240-61. The balun on my TH7 was a coax choke wound on a large 4C65 (~61 mix) Toroid: http://m0.i.pbase.co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00469.html (9,791 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 25
Page: [1] [2]