Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Which\s+issue\s+of\s+QST\s+for\s+mobile\s+ant\s+comparisons\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Which\s+issue\s+of\s+QST\s+for\s+mobile\s+ant\s+comparisons\?\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Which issue of QST for mobile ant comparisons?? (score: 1): Author: zeitler@ibm.net (zeitler@ibm.net); Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1998 20:17:59 -0700; Apparently W6KKt ran a comparison of several mobile antennas on 80 meters. I would like to know the date of the issue if anyone knows it. Looks like the HamStick is pretty lossy compared to most othe; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00036.html (7,275 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Which issue of QST for mobile ant comparisons?? (score: 1): Author: ac6tk@cybertime.net (J. Bradshaw); Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1998 15:19:05 -0000; Try Sept. 95. pg. 68. Tests were conducted on 75m. Proof positive, ya gotta have metal! Apparently W6KKt ran a comparison of several mobile antennas on 80 meters. I would like to know the date of the; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00059.html (7,941 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]