Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Why\s+a\s+Prop\s+Pitch\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Why\s+a\s+Prop\s+Pitch\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Why a Prop Pitch? (score: 1): Author: NPAlex@aol.com; Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:44:06 EST; John, I can only guess from your comment that you have not had any experience with a prop pitch motor used as a rotator. There are several reasons that one would use a prop pitch motor. One was cost,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00668.html (8,208 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Why a Prop Pitch? (score: 1): Author: "larryjspammenot@teleport.com" <larryj@teleport.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:09:15 -0800 (GMT-08:00); For many years, I've seen one of the small prop-pitch rotors under a home-brew 3-element 10-Meter beam on a local building. The rotor and beam look like they have been abandoned many years ago. Judgi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00669.html (12,024 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Why a Prop Pitch? (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:34:00 -0800; And, of course, with a lot fewer propellor planes using electrical adjust (small planes use hydraulics, and so do many large ones), they're not available in the surplus market. Does someone have a ty; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00681.html (11,798 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Why a Prop Pitch? (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:08:37 -0800; Not tubular towers, rather lattice type crankups. UST has those dimensions on its web site. For the "5" series towers, the max diameter is 8.25 inches. Besides this constraint, you would like to be; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00683.html (8,370 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Why a Prop Pitch? (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:25:25 -0800; NEMA 56C is a 5 7/8" bolt circle, with the flange being a bit bigger in diameter than that. A typical 1/4 HP to 1/2 HP TENV DC motor is about 6.5" across the mounting foot. Looking through the Boston; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00684.html (10,630 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Why a Prop Pitch? (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:57:10 -0800 (PST); The prop pitch is many 1000's to 1. Yes It would be great if you could do that for us and start a business selling rotors for crankups. We need some long term strategy to overcome the finite supply o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00685.html (8,401 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Why a Prop Pitch? (score: 1): Author: NPAlex@aol.com; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:16:31 EST; It appears that I may have started this thread with my response to "Why a prop pitch" I guess I need to make additional comment. Maybe standard components as has been described in the other emails wi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00687.html (11,494 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Why a Prop Pitch? (score: 1): Author: "Marc Wullaert ON4MA" <marc.wullaert3@pandora.be>; Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:52:47 -0000; If I could fine them here in europe for a good price that shood be my rotorsystem . marc on4ma 16:06 _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ To; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00692.html (9,922 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Why a Prop Pitch? (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 05:25:00 -0800; Which, the prop pitch or the industrial motors? If the latter, they should be readily available. I don't know what the dominant motor/gearbox makers are in Europe though. Bosch? Siemens? ABB?(all are; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00696.html (8,276 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]