Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Why\s+does\s+Cushcraft\s+R7\s+work\s+so\s+well\s+without\s+radials\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Why does Cushcraft R7 work so well without radials? (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (michael watts)
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 09:42:13 -0800 (PST)
Hello TowerTalkers, The Cushcraft R7 and R8 verticals seem to work pretty well. They use 8 "whiskers" that are about 3 feet long as the ground plane. Why does this work so well? Would it work better
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00206.html (8,582 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Why does Cushcraft R7 work so well without radials? (score: 1)
Author: k6sdw@arrl.net (Eddy Avila)
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 18:53:49 -0000
Hi Mike, I guess you have to ask what's you're definition of "work well?" Does the R7 and R8 radiate a signal, apparently it does....but the real question to ask is: how much signal does it radiate a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00207.html (10,245 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Why does Cushcraft R7 work so well without radials? (score: 1)
Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver)
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 11:09:44 -0800 (PST)
The "whiskers" aren't really a ground plane - they create capacitance at the base of the antenna. If you extended them, then more capacitance would be present, most likely seriously upsetting the tun
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00209.html (9,955 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Why does Cushcraft R7 work so well without radials? (score: 1)
Author: T93m@aol.com (T93m@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:45:33 EST
FYI R7,R8 and other similar verticals from Hygain and MFJ are actually half wave vertical radiators. Those 47 inches "radials" are not radials at all, they are just another 1/8 of center fed vertical
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00210.html (8,771 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Why does Cushcraft R7 work so well without radials? (score: 1)
Author: T93m@aol.com (T93m@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 22:17:05 EST
YES, as I said PA4AO did the testing with his GP for 20M and R6000. It's on the air and S-meter measurement. It is very clear to understand why R6000 outperformed 1/4 vertical with 3 elevated radials
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00216.html (8,451 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Why does Cushcraft R7 work so well without radials? (score: 1)
Author: ValErwin@aol.com (ValErwin@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:20:19 EST
Hi Danny: Your comments regarding the CC verticals are appreciated by the group -- Just curious, are you still an employee of CC? It seems we met at Dayton about two years ago and briefly discussed m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00225.html (8,417 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Why does Cushcraft R7 work so well without radials? (score: 1)
Author: T93m@aol.com (T93m@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:29:46 EST
<< Hi Danny: Your comments regarding the CC verticals are appreciated by the group -- Just curious, are you still an employee of CC? It seems we met at Dayton about two years ago and briefly discusse
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00234.html (8,689 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Why does Cushcraft R7 work so well without radials? (score: 1)
Author: T93m@aol.com (T93m@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 20:02:14 EST
<< Danny: How do you think the R6000 or R8 would perform over a steel roof. The base of the antenna would be about 2 to 3 feet above the roof. It's too low and antenna would not match. Probably will
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00235.html (8,541 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Why does Cushcraft R7 work so well without radials? (score: 1)
Author: rmcgaver@wi.rr.com (Richard McGaver)
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 04:40:44 -0600
I use a R7 about 4' off a 100 X 100 steel roof and operate a fair amount of QRP DX with good results. At 100 watts I work most of what i hear....... with patience Rick NK9G --Original Message-- From:
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00241.html (9,571 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu