Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Why\s+not\s+steel\s+for\s+boom\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Why\s+not\s+steel\s+for\s+boom\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Why not steel for boom? (score: 1): Author: wb4mnf@atl.org (Bob Duckworth); Date: Sat, 25 Oct 1997 10:07:47 +0100; I'm scouting around for boom material for my 3 ele 40 and was wondering if anyone is using the popular 4130 mast alloy for boom material and if it is a bad idea. -bob wb4mnf -- FAQ on WWW: http://www; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00702.html (6,963 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Why not steel for boom? (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 11:04:38 -0500 (EST); << I'm scouting around for boom material for my 3 ele 40 and was wondering if anyone is using the popular 4130 mast alloy for boom material and if it is a bad idea. >> Ouch! This will be a rotator an; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00739.html (7,473 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Why not steel for boom? (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 10:59:30 -0600; Did the old SWAN beams use a steel boom. I think they did and they were heavy but they lasted a long time in the air. Smaller diameter boom if I remember correctly. Oh well, maybe it wasn't a good id; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00743.html (7,902 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]