Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Wind\s+survival\s+\+\s+load\s+ratings\.\.\.\s+vs\,\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Wind survival + load ratings... vs, (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:37:23 -0700
<Overall, hams are probably more comfortable running and believing an <electrical model than a mechanical one (more time to become familiar, <etc.? or just because the ham tests ask you about electri
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-11/msg00015.html (11,441 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Wind survival + load ratings... vs, (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:45:18 -0700
On 11/1/17 11:37 AM, Jim Thomson wrote: Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 06:06:10 -0700 From: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net> To: towertalk@contesting.com Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Wind survival + load ratings
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-11/msg00016.html (8,872 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Wind survival + load ratings... vs, (score: 1)
Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 13:08:03 -0700
I have tried to follow this thread with some interest.  My experience with mechanical design has been limited to using Leeson's (W6QHS) spreadsheets.  Also, I tend to use very modest antennas that I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-11/msg00017.html (7,954 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Wind survival + load ratings... vs, (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 16:17:25 -0500
Thanks to Jim for his mechanical help on this 17/30 antenna. It will go up (if the plan holds) later this month. I would temper Jim's comments though for the practical. It took a lot more work than I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-11/msg00018.html (14,073 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Wind survival + load ratings... vs, (score: 1)
Author: Kurt Andress <andresskurt@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 22:04:20 -0700
Wes, you inquired..... That said, I was involved in helping a friend install a Steppir DB42 on his foldover tower.? From what I saw, it would be impossible to account for all of the stuff mounted on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-11/msg00033.html (8,471 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Wind survival + load ratings... vs, (score: 1)
Author: Kurt Andress <andresskurt@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 22:58:13 -0700
AC0C inquired..... Message: 8 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 23:54:06 -0500 From: "Jeff"<keepwalking188@ac0c.com> To:<kurt@k7nv.com>, <towertalk@contesting.com> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Subject: Wind survival
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-11/msg00034.html (8,323 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Wind survival + load ratings... vs, (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 10:12:03 -0700
Sigh, I wish he had used a different terminology. It's purely semantics but I think the phrase "crosswind principle" is misleading. It's a fictitious force that does not exist in reality. If you have
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-11/msg00041.html (8,893 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Wind survival + load ratings... vs, (score: 1)
Author: Kurt Andress <andresskurt@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 21:32:05 -0700
I'm with you Jim! Maybe a poor choice of phenomenon description, but that was how Weber saw it...... And, he was the first one to step outside the box and tell everyone they were doing it all wrong!
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-11/msg00082.html (10,401 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Wind survival + load ratings... vs, (score: 1)
Author: Kurt Andress <andresskurt@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 18:34:52 -0800
Hi Jeff, I did not..... 73, Kurt Message: 8 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 23:54:06 -0500 From: "Jeff"<keepwalking188@ac0c.com> To:<kurt@k7nv.com>, <towertalk@contesting.com> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Subject:
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-12/msg00054.html (7,744 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu