Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Windload\s+at\s+90\s+mph\s+\(was\:\s+Plumbing\s+a\s+tower\)\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Windload at 90 mph (was: Plumbing a tower) (score: 1)
Author: "W7CE" <w7ce@curtiss.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:49:45 -0800
Is 20 lb/sq ft correct for 90 mi/hr winds? I've run several of the published formulas in the past and seen other references that would indicated that 36 lb/sq ft is a good number to use at 90 mph. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00487.html (7,394 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Windload at 90 mph (was: Plumbing a tower) (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wendling <cpwendling@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:00:35 -0800 (PST)
Clay, Yes, you're in the ballpark. The formula for drag is 1/2* rho*velocity-squared*frontal-area*coefficient-of-drag. I calculate about 26 lbs force for 90 mph for 1 sq-ft frontal projection area. T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00488.html (10,092 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Windload at 90 mph (was: Plumbing a tower) (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:33:57 -0800
36 lb/sf is more like 120 mi/hr... lb/sqft = Vmph^2/391 is the equation. 8100/391 -> 8000/400 -> 20 approx 391 is the half the density of air in weird units (F = 1/2 * A * rho * V^2) ________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00489.html (8,452 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Windload at 90 mph (was: Plumbing a tower) (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:45:21 -0800
Indeed.. I just used 1.0 for Cd for rough and ready order of magnitude. I was thinking in terms of a tubular free standing tower (as opposed to, say, a lattice HDBX style) 1.3 might be a reasonable n
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00490.html (8,470 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Windload at 90 mph (was: Plumbing a tower) (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wendling <cpwendling@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:09:46 -0800 (PST)
Jim, Yes, I figured you used a Cd of 1.0, which is a reasonable starting place. Nice to know there is another "aero" guy on the towertalk list. Below is a link to some very good information on commun
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00491.html (9,825 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Windload at 90 mph (Was: Plumbing a tower) (score: 1)
Author: "Clay Curtiss" <clay@curtiss.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:43:59 -0800
Is 20 lb/sq ft correct for 90 mi/hr winds? I've run several of the published formulas in the past and seen other references that would indicated that 36 lb/sq ft is a good number to use at 90 mph. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00492.html (9,217 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Windload at 90 mph (was: Plumbing a tower) (score: 1)
Author: "W7CE" <w7ce@curtiss.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:51:09 -0800
Thanks for the info. I don't know as much about this as I'd like, but I'm learning. From your comments I assume that 20-26 lbs would apply to round tower legs (Rohn 65G here) and typical yagi booms a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00494.html (11,363 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Windload at 90 mph (was: Plumbing a tower) (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wendling <cpwendling@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:46:57 -0800 (PST)
Clay, Great question! Difficult answer. I'm assuming that the projected areas are the same for both the 1/2" and 2" tubing in your question. It may be counter-intuitive, but many times the smaller di
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00495.html (12,510 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu