Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Wire\s+antenna\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Wire\s+antenna\?\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Wire antenna? (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 10:49:28 -0700; All true, but I'd bet that the folks who think an end fed wire makes a good all band antenna don't much care about pattern. If they can feed it and make random contacts without burning up their rig; /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-07/msg00032.html (9,538 bytes)
22. Re: [TowerTalk] Wire antenna? (score: 1): Author: john@kk9a.com; Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 13:18:04 -0500; I concur however most hams can only measure one thing - SWR. They do not know or care about the pattern or even any losses if the SWR is good. Speaking of patterns, look how popular the magical all b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-07/msg00033.html (8,681 bytes)
23. Re: [TowerTalk] Wire antenna? (score: 1): Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>; Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:56:02 -0500; I wouldn't say quite random; they just have lots of lobes. A model will give you a pretty good idea of the pattern. The big unknown will always be the ground system loss, but that doesn't affect the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-07/msg00035.html (9,667 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 23
Page: [1] [2]