Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Wire\s+size\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Wire\s+size\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Wire size (score: 1): Author: w3svj@juno.com (N. S. FIRESTONE); Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 07:17:15 -0400; Is there any theoretical or, more importantly, practical difference in the performance of a vertical antenna using "skinny" buried radials. If I planned to use ten radials of #16 bare copper and then; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00498.html (7,494 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Wire size (score: 1): Author: k3nd@yahoo.com (GALE STEWARD); Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 05:22:35 -0700 (PDT); Nate, It's a waste of money to go to 4/0. Also probably a lot harder to install. The ground return currents couple to the radials and the current divides by the number of wires. Therefore, each radia; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00502.html (9,048 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Wire size (score: 1): Author: ed_juge@zianet.com (Ed Juge); Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 08:05:37 -0500; Hi, Nate... My best guess is there won't be any noticeable difference by increasing the wire size. I used #30 or so, and expect it to survive me. If you want to get a better ground system, go with mo; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00507.html (9,275 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Wire size (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements); Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 09:26:52 -0500; This subject is treated very thoroughly in ON4UN's new ARRL book, "Low Band DXing". I will send you a summary if you do not have access to a copy. (((73))) Phil, K5PC "The Dark Ages were caused by a; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00511.html (8,739 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]